The millenium project
and Norwegian state terrorism
John Grover
Contents:
Introduction 2
US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania on 7 August 1998 2
Kosovo and the Chinese embassy bombing 4
The Moscow apartment building bombs in September 1999 5
Kursk and Cole 6
John F.Kennedy Jr. 6
The blasts in Hebei and Lin Fang 7
The assassination of Laurent Kabila 8
The Omagh bomb on 15 August 1998 9
What is the SEK? 12
The Pope's visit to Syria and the pirate attempt 14
Hotel Torre de Cali 15
Barbara Ann Ford and Manuel Giminez 17
The Buba-radio 18
Norwegian FM Jagland in Israel 20
Norwegian state terrorism in the Middle East 22
Kissufim fence bomb 24
Conclusion 25
Parcel bomb in Madrid and a land mine on Sri Lanka 25
Bomb in Medellin and a blast in Londonderry 28
Car bomb in Madrid and Klara Mandic in Belgrade 28
The reason for all this 29
The norsies and the nazis 31
Status of the project 32
Money is needed 33
A conclusion 34
Appendix 1: From the diaries 1994-1995: The Dirty Beast in
The Revelation 37
Appendix 2: The diary entry for 16 February 1995: 1/0 48
Appendix 3: Antarctica 56
Appendix 4: The Middle East crisis and its solution 60
Letter 23 May 2001 on Saad Eddin Ibrahim 62
The millenium project and state terrorism
John Grover
Introduction
In this study, I present some examples which support the view that Norway
makes systematic use of international terror in building the state. This has
been going on at least since 1997, and perhaps since Gro
Harlem Brundtland left Norwegian politics for WHO.
The principle is this: State-owned companies select an authorship for representing
themselves and finance terrorism which represent their interests by way of this
authorship. Then the state dresses up in that authorship and receives its political
fuel from the international terror which addresses the same authorship in the
global domain. This is a way of reaching a larger global scope for their interests.
It is generally difficult to discover which authorship is at stake or even to
discover that the thing is going on, unless one has knowledge of the details.
The Norwegian state has been using my authorship and the indexing of it to a
very large extent, and also seems to have stolen my unpublished manuscripts
from my computer and subjected me to rather unpleasant persecution which has
forced me to flee from the country.
This is the socalled Monkeybiz
Project which has developed into state terrorism in the course of short
time. There has been a long series of international terrorist acts through the
last two-three years which index me and my authorship and thus serve to support
this Monkeybiz Project - which now look more and more like Norwegian state terrorism.
I here go through the most important and wellknown ones - such as the US embassy
bombs in Kenya and Tanzania, the Moscow apartment building bombs, the Chinese
embassy bombs and aspects of the Kosovo war, Kursk and Cole, the Hebei bombs
in China and the assassination of Laurent Kabila in Congo, and some more scattered
but telling examples. In fact all these major cases of terrorism from recent
times seem to be directly related to monkeybusiness on my authorship since 1997
and seem to serve Norwegian interests. While it is a fact that these do support
Norwegian business interests, the question who ordered and paid for the terrorism
can perhaps still be left open at least for some of them. It is perhaps not
essential for the basic observation that the terrorism does support Norwegian
interests. And when that tendency becomes sufficiently consistent and thorough,
the conclusion can in any case be made that the state works by means of state
terrorism.
US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania on 7 August 1998
After my PhD dissertation had been rejected in Norway for dirty business purposes
on 27 July 1998, there were the two US
embassy bombings on 7 August, in Nairobi Kenya and Dar es Salaam Tanzania.
Osama
bin Laden, a person who is similar to me in several respects, was introduced
in the news to serve as an explanation to it. Claims to responsibility were
faxed in from France, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (see the reports and
the density of 'John-Bjarne-Grover' signification in them). The large number
of Kenya-doctor-Tanzania hypes is telling of political and business purposes
behind the bombings. A part of the obviously planned arrangement seems to have
been the Paust
couple - Per Paust was 'project leader' for defence and security in the Norwegian
foreign ministry before he died after a 'short and serious disease' on 6 May
1999, the day before the Chinese embassy bombs in Belgrade, and his wife Anne
Orderud Paust was the personal secretary of the defence minister Løwer
before she was assassinated 16 days later. In the summer 1998, the Pausts were
subjected to two theatrical 'attempts' with a strong indexation of me in them,
with much police help and media attention, before and after the bombings. The
first attempt (a 'bomb' - dynamite, without ignition, though - found under the
car, probably to represent the Dar es Salaam bomb) was on 15 July (before
the bombs, that is), the second on 12 August, probably for Nairobi, was
a mysterious installation of a gas container (gass-BEholDER, obviously for PhD)
and a plastic hose to the keyhole in the door, with a discontinuous petrol stripe
(jump-lunte) out of the house etc - very symbolic of my name and PhD dissertation.
An electric conductor was found on the road - the word 'veileder' means both
scientific advisor for a PhD and an electric conductor on the road. A piece
of the fence outside the house had been stolen in the course of the night -
that means just Jens-Erik
Fenstad who was in the evaluation committee.
|
Norwegian terrorists (in the guise of the Norwegian Research Council) reject my PhD dissertation |
Another member was Jens-Erland
Braarwig and had his name in an outdoor lamp that also was stolen at that
time. Paust explained the dynamite under the car as due to wrong car: There
were many Golf cars ('jo mange golfer')
in the area. He had just time to put on jumper and pants before the fire engine
arrived, he said to the press. And so forth: There is no doubt about the precise
indexing of me and my PhD in the 'attempts' which certainly had been made by
Norwegian authorities. The same authorities also emphasized that there could
be no doubt about the fact that the two attempts (15 July and 12 August) had
been made by one and the same person... This means that if the second attempt
represented the US embassy bombs, the first must have done so as well - and
hence the Norwegian authorities must have known about the embassy bombs in advance.
The Pausts had to 'flee' to New York in the autumn 1998, for four months. Since
then, the norses have been rather obsessed with sabotaging and pirating my project.
The Africa bombs were obviously made for business purposes and have left traces
in many ways. As an example, on Spice
Girls' record 'Forever',
there is the repeated undervoice saying "Spice Girls - doctor - dance with
me" which has its effect from those two bombs in August 1998 and my rejected
doctorate. And Talk Magazine
is probably just Doktorgraden - the Doctorate. See the logo. These are,
of course, just as much doing something with the case as they are profiting
from them.
The political effect of the US embassy bombings is quite interesting, since
Dar es Salaam Tanzania combined with the time point when it happened, ten forty
(Nairobi Kenya was at ten thirty, suggesting John
Fitzgerald Kennedy whose name rewrites to mine), suggests the name Kjell
Magne Bondevik who was prime minister at that time. Bondevik seems to have
been the masterminder behind the monkeybiz. The story goes back to the summer
1997 when I sent my Pilot Study application to the Norwegian
Research Council in the middle of June 1997. In August, when no receipt
had arrived, I inquired and was told that yes, the application had been received
and was registered in the archive, but, alas, it was gone. Could I please send
in a copy, and hurry up for the copy to reach a meeting? I so did, and received
the rejection letter on 27 October, after Bondevik had started his government
on 17 October, a government wherein all members had names that were either phonologically
or semantically similar to mine - a sure sign that my application had gone to
monkeybiz in the research council. Siri
Meyer was selected for the role of monkeybiz application. She sent in her
own application after mine had been rejected, and hers was conspicuously similar
to mine, at least in the summary which is all I have got hold of. She was also
hastily promoted to professor on basis of rather meager merits (as far as I
know), and Bondevik, by the research council. selected her to the then prestigious
5-member national Committee for Power and Democracy which was to make a re-description
of the power structure in Norway. (The presence of Meyer, an art historian,
in this committee lifted some eyebrows). Meyer's role seems to have been the
monkeybiz application instead of the application I had sent to the research
council, while I (by the name John Bjarne Grøver) was supposed to be
the undertext in the government, in temporary (!) exhibitions and other cultural
activities, on stamps, even in the new postal codes (see e.g. the new numbers
0777, 7770 and 7777). This was to prepare for the state terrorism which subsequently
developed, to allow the state to be driven by international terrorism on those
indexes which carried the installations. Siri Meyer was at SEK, the Centre for
European Culture studies in Bergen, and profited from the role of Siv-Ellen
Kraft (SEK) in my book "The
Theatre of the Heart" which was part of my PhD dissertation from 1997.
Seventh of August, the date of the US embassy bombs, rewrites to her
name. Why US embassies? For Ronk
Roever ('masturbate arses') and Ronk
Kusa ('masturbate the cunt'). So, if monkeybizers out for pirating my project
were behind the US embassy bombs, that explains why bin Laden, who seems rather
to be a peaceful poet in Afghanistan and similar to me in several respects (dissident,
age, Al Qaeda cp. alco-eater for Drunk Roever), is blamed in the news.
Kosovo and the Chinese embassy bombing
The Kosovo
conflict broke out in the morning when I changed the official spelling of my
name from Grøver to Grover (removed slash from the 'O'). I had applied
for this some weeks earlier, around the time when the conflict started to take
shape, and after I had collected permission from the other Grovers
in Norway, I returned around 17 March with the final application. Deputy
prime minister Lahstein
immediately went on sick leave due to acute eye
catarrh and she returned in the morning when my name was changed and the
conflict broke out. (Den norske Bank, the biggest norse bank, owned by the state,
announced surprise merger with Postbanken - 'on the spank' - the same morning,
after secret and hurried negotiations).
 |
"Fancy a secret and hurried negotiation, darling". Norwegian terrorist-bankers plan a surprise merger. |
The name was telling of the conflict, since Ronk
Røver means roughly Sokovo Bersia in Norwegian, while Ronk
Rover means only Sokovo Rover. I have speculated if this was the reason for
the war, but I am not sure.
Anyhow, after the bombings on reverse had started after 12 April, the
first one between Djakovica
and Meya (for John Grover and Meyer),
there was the climax of this in the Chinese
embassy on 7 May, for Siri Meyer: Beijing and Seven May gives
Siri Meyer. This turned out to be a turning point in the 'project period'
- the half way between the application and April 2001. ('Kursk'
should have been lifted in April but it has been postponed some months).
In fact the Kosovo crisis can be seen to run in a quite precise parallel to
the story of my PhD dissertation, which I mainly wrote in London
in 1997. I handed it in to Bergen University on 2 December 1997, after which
it probably soon was subjected to monkeybiz initiatives. When I returned to
Bergen in June 1998, I found that my name was undertext in the newspapers and
e.g. an exhibition
about the brain seemed to be monkeybiz on my book "The theatre of the
heart". After it was rejected in letter dated 27 July, and after the bombs,
and after the Lithuanian exhibition which opened in Bergen 6 days after the
US embassy bombs in an imitation of my "Theatre of the heart" and
poetry books, and with Landsbergis
(certainly not informed about the African bombs) invited to speak and play piano
on the opening, the appeal process at the university lasted untill the end of
January 1999, after which I appealed to the ministry where school, church and
research minister Lilletun
could have accepted it. At the end of March 1999, when the Kosovo air campaign
started, I suppose it could have been accepted, and in April, time was out and
the Littleton
school massacre took place in the US. The boys seem to have planned it throughout
the appeal process. The massacre was a result of the monkeybiz with the embassy
bombings, and it said, like all the other US school shootings throughout the
Bondevik period, that the application for the larger poetic reality must be
accepted.
The Moscow apartment building bombs in September 1999
Even the massive Moscow apartment bombs, leaving hundreds dead in these blocks
of flats, turned out to be a tragic representation of my name, in the addresses
of the buildings and some other indexations (see below). The representation
is precise. Short time after the last bomb, deputy prime minister Lahnstein
resigned and promised that she would never return to politics again, Blair
jolted Peter Mandelson back into
the government again, while Jimmy Carter
came on a quick trip to Norway and told the norses that he had expected to get
some money from them, in terms of the Nobel peace prize after Camp
David, but he had not yet got those money. But the norses are so very generous,
so very generous, he said, it can perhaps even happen to be the most generous
country in the world... Carter, who took up Sudan, China, Irak and Burma in
talks before he travelled on to Holland and Mali, seems to have said: Pay money
to John Bjarne Grover instead of bombing his name in Moscow.
But I did not get any money. Instead, Bondevik's administration (it must have
been) put me in a madhouse
some weeks later, with forced psychiatric treatment to cure me of the 'delusions'
that my name was undertext in the newspapers and in his government. My health
was fine, of course, but I suppose the administration may have been nervous
about the high number of terrorist acts which now could be put in connection
to the systematic use of my name in the administration and in activities in
all parts of the Norwegian society. The madhouse served to pirate my authority
just like the rejection of my PhD had served to pirate my authorship. The purpose
was to run off with the goodwill which the global community could have met my
project on global signification with. When I finally got out of the madhouse
in January 2000, after having spent the millenium shift behind their walls,
I had to flee from the country.
 |
Grøver flees to Lithuania, closely followed by Norwegian state terrorists. |
Here is the evidence that the Moscow apartment building bombs in 1999 really
indexed my name and the Ronk
Roever symbolism:
1. August 31: Manezh
Square shopping centre near the Kremlin was bombed. A note was found from
"Union
of Revolutionary Writers" who seemed (but not really, according to
their leader who said they were not involved) to claim responsibility, with
the message (according to CNN): "A dead consumer's unfinished hamburger
is a revolutionary hamburger. Consumers: We don't like your way of life and
it's unsafe for you". The 'hamburger' seems to be the 'john grover' with
the 'revolution' in the 'consumption' field, the Ronk
Røver. Is there also a 'rejection on a formal basis'? The message seems
to be a travesty on my own writings, where I e.g. in a letter to the university
of Bergen make claims as to the revolutionary status of my work. I made such
claims after my PhD dissertation had been rejected on a formal basis, and I
wrote that this was due to its revolutionary character.
2. September 9: Guryanova
Street no.19. 'Guryanova' is similar to 'John Grover'.
3. September 13: The house at the intersection Kashinskoye Shosse (no.6) and
Varshavskoye Shosse. 'Kashka' = Norw. 'kloever' (clover),
and 'kasha' = Norw. 'groet' (porridge),
together 'groever' as the former spelling of my name, and the porridge alludes
to 'ronk'.
'Var-' is a morph which densely represents 'ronk',
including 'beer', 'mitten', 'variation', 'milk boiled in oven' etc.
4. September 16: A truck bomb in Volgodonsk,
outside a block of flats. 'Volgodonsk' is close to 'john grover'.
5. The last case in September was in Buinaksk
in Dagestan = Boy-Naked Dagger-Jan = John [B]jarn-egg Røver = John Bjarne
Groever, etc. Also, 'bøynakke' is 'bent
neck'.
When these bombings, which claimed hundreds of lives, strongly represented my
name and took place in September for 'Siv-Ellen Kraft', there is no doubt that
they conform to the pattern of rogue norse politics and served to support norse
political and business interests. After a first limited search in an internet
cafe, I discovered the pattern some days later when I searched internet from
my home computer for data on these bombings. An hour or so after my search began,
and 20 minutes after it was ended, the Ostankino
TV tower in Moscow took fire by short circuitry in the electronics.
Kursk and Cole
In the summer 2000, the Vatican published the third
secret of Fatima, which turned out to be about me. At least, it seemed to
be about the genetic formation of my authorship, while the first two
secrets were about my father and mother. Madonna had appeared on a young holmoak
in Cova da Iria in Fatima a few months after my father's birth, and between
the abdication of the last Tsar and the Bolshevik revolution. The interesting
thing for the Norwegian monkeybizers was the fact that the time from the abdication
to my birth was exactly the time from my birth to the beginning of Bondevik's
government in 1997. That explained the curious role of me in Bondevik's government,
and it explains how Bondevik could be hypnotized by my application, letting
him stare into the millenium tsar reign on the other side of the abdication
mirrored in my application. A world reign based on terror and monkeybiz...
Hence Siri Meyer, for the monkeybiz, and the Chinese embassy bomb. "Terror
and monkeybiz" is the political strategy which has been developed in Norway
since then.
No sooner had this relation to Fatima been discovered and set forth in a series
of emailed scriptures from my hand, the Norwegian monkeybizers (perhaps with
some US assistance?) must have started figuring out new tricks. Whether the
dream of a Russian tsar reign and revolution now had taken shape also in Stoltenberg
who had taken over in the mean time, I don't know, but the fact must quickly
have been computed, if it had not already been computed in advance, that the
time span from the first Madonna revelation in Lourdes in 1858 to my mother's
birth was exactly the time from my mother's birth to 12 August 2000 when Kursk
was sunk by two explosions in the Barents Sea. In addition, a clever soul may
have computed that if 30666
days is added to my father's birth, you get 12 October 2000, the day when Cole
was bombed in Aden. Kursk and Cole therefore together constitute the Dirty
Beast in the Revelation, in a way which is too precise to be coincidental.
They also constitute mirror endpoints on an axis with Belgrade in the middle,
allowing Oslo to swap with Jerusalem and Kursk with Cole, and Norway with Saudi
Arabia (the home of dissident bin Laden), a sort of millenium orgasm which may
have motivated the bombing of the Chinese embassy on 7 May.
And that historic mapping onto my authorship which had been pirated by the norses
was the purpose of these two terrorist acts, it seems, in extension from the
US embassy bombs and the Kosovo war. There can be no doubt that Kursk and Cole
must have been planned in advance and consciously carried out in order to represent
the indexes of my parents for fuelling the terrorist state and pirate my authorship.
John F.Kennedy Jr.
Even if John
F.Kennedy's aircrash well may have been (and probably was) due to other
factors, there are a couple of facts which makes it natural to ask if his airplane
was sabotaged. The first is that Nairobi Ten Thirty Kenya rewrites to both John
Bjarne Groever and to John Fitzgerald Kennedy, while the ten forty in Dar es
Salaam rewrites to Kjell Magne Bondevik. The second is that the plane crashed
near Kennedy's estate on Martha's
Vineyard, which makes it an 'Endmorgan'
event if we assume that Kennedy was born on Kennedy's estate. If sabotage should
make for that, it would have to be by some electronic sabotage working on that
particular location.
Curiously, almost exacty the same place was also the location for the EgyptAir
crash later in 1999, in the morning before Clinton travelled to Oslo. It happened
at 01.47
NY time, and the aircraft allegedly described a big
N in the air before it fell down. The number of victims was almost as big
as the number of victims in the US embassy bombs on 7 August 1998. Norwegians
can have done that in order to put the blame for the US embassy bombs on Clinton.
The blasts in Hebei and Lin Fang
On 6 March 2001, there was a school blast in the little village Lin
Fang in China. Assuming that it is by the Monkeybiz Project, it may mean
kiss my arse and Finlandia, the symphonic work by the Finnish
composer Jean
Sibelius, here probably to be taken as Jean
Rebellious, for JohnG Rover with a French style. Jean Sover means Jean Sleeps
(as in the dormitories below). The school blast was blamed on a 'madman' in
a school producing fireworks. Replacing the R and S as in Sibelius/Rebellious,
this gives fiseworks, where 'fise' is Norwegian for 'fart'. That gives
John Groever - Grøver with the slash on and off the O.
There is also the obvious reference to Finland and perhaps its historic relationship
to its neighbour. This may perhaps be related to the four dormitory building
blasts 10 days later, since that is a pattern which is very similar to the blasts
in the Russian blocks of flats in September 1998. The blasts occurred in the
district Hebei,
in Shijiazhuang,
two names which strongly refer to schizophrenic, since the original designation
for schizophrenia was hebephrenia.
The blasts occurred in cotton mill dormitories on 16
March 2001, between 4.17 and 5.20 in the morning. I take these data to refer
to the name Ulla Birgitte Heggelund,
another addressee on a letter which could be found on the computer which the
Norwegian authorities plundered on 22 November 1999 after they had driven me
to the madhouse. Sixteen March rewrites rather well to Birgitte, while Ulla
means wooly or wool-like, such as cotton, reinforced by the phonology of 'mill'.
Heggelund is a name which may associate with dormitories for various reasons
- 'hekkelun' is for 'nesting-place-cosy', 'eggelund' will mean 'egg grove',
'hyggelig' means 'pleasant', and so forth. The cosy and wooly nesting place
is the dormitory. And Jean Sover means Jean Sleeps. The time points 4.17 to
5.20 refers to me and my name.
'Hedelund' (meaning 'plain/heathland grove', as a sort of paradox) is the innermost
name in the last and most important text in my book "A
deep ratch" from the summer 2000. I sent a letter to Ulla Heggelund
in Oslo well before Christmas, and I recognized the contents of that letter
in the Christmas
terror (which seemed to address the context of Telenor's address in
Bergen), such as in the bombs in Pakistan. 'Heggebakken 2' is the address of
Telenor in Bergen, the national telecom company. The leader (at least so far)
of that telecom, Tormod
Hermansen, participated in the opening of Kirsti
Koch Christensen's rectorate 1999, making for a triumvirate together with
Rommetveit.
These three represent Norway's biggest oil company, the biggest bank,
the biggest and national telecom company, and when it comes to considering the
role of these in possible state terrorism, such as in terrorist advertising
for Statoil
and Telenor,
there are good reasons to point out that they have all the chances they need
for undisclosed international money transfers and telecommunication. And rather
unlimited financial resources for 'marketing' in e.g. Statoil. I recognized
Telenor as having a strong role in the Christmas terror, and I recognized that
in the Pakistani bombs which seemed to refer to my letter to Ulla Heggelund.
I have tried to write to her again but have not received an answer. The reason
for that could be that the Norwegian communications are blocked by the mafioso
monkeybizers who steal my letter to her, just as seemed to be the case before
Christmas - or it could be that she has been detained by the Monkeybiz Project.
I myself suffered such detention in the madhouse in Bergen, and I am happy that
I managed to get out of the country in time. Now they have changed the law to
allow for detention and forced treatment of political dissidents. When Christensen
as rector at the university in Bergen has a 'carte
blanche' to use the Norwegian secret services, I suppose she can also ask
for having letters stopped and opened. That happened many times for me in Bergen.
I guess that the purpose could be to use the contents of the letters in monkeybiz
or terrorist marketing of Statoil and similars, perhaps even before the letter
reached me.
[Editor's note: Readers may be a bit confused if they visit the various websites above. Tormod Hermansen has since stepped down from the Board at Telenor, but is now on the Board of Den norske Bank. Kare Rommetveit still lists himself as a Board member of the Bank, but doesn't appear on the Bank's website. And Kirsti Koch Christensen lists herself as on the Board of Statoil, but doesn't appear on the Statoil website (although she used to — although doesn't the head look as though it's been stuck on afterwards?). An why does the state oil company have a professor of linguistics on the board anyway?]
With the general tendency for the Norwegian Monkeybiz Project to try to pirate
my authorship, it is easy to see how the data from the Chinese Hebei blasts
point to a Norwegian origin. And the proof? That Jagland's
ministry on
16 March published
a press release saying that Norway deletes Tanzania's debt to Norway. I
tried to open the press release on the government's website, and immediately
the machine broke down.
The reason for the reference to schizophrenic in these Hebei blasts is to be
found in my diary fragment from 12 September 1994, the one which later turned
out to be about the 'Dirty Beast in the Revelation'. I sent this diary fragment
out on 8 January 2001 after I had discovered that it had been written in the
mid point between the dates for Kursk and Cole, albeit 6 years before. The importance
of the piece of writing was evident: It contained exactly that material which
it should contain if it were to be a precise representation of the concept of
'the genetic
formation of my authorship', which is precisely what Kursk and Cole are
about in this connection.
 |
Norwegian state organisations sponsor more than terrorism. |
The assassination of Laurent Kabila
The key now is Laurent Kabila, since the diary fragment contains the essential
word kabellengde
(meaning the maritime measure 'league', but also simply 'cable length',
such as Telenor can be interested in ). There are some reasons why Kabila Laurent
as a rewrite of Kabel Lengde seems to be of relevance here: The assassination
of Kabila happened just 8 days after I first sent out the diary fragment serving
as proof, which means that the monkeybizers suddenly became aware of the evidential
importance of that document which proves that the project on global signification
and formalized diachrony
is mine and that I had worked with this project for many years when the monkeybizers
discovered it and plunged into it in order to pirate it for business purposes
(selling more hotdogs and things
like that). Hence the assassination of Kabila can be seen as motivated by the
wish to re-pirate the project - and to sell even more hotdogs.
There is another strong reason for this: The date of Kursk is 12 August, and
that is also the date of birth of my niece ('niesen', which with a Russian accent
also can mean 'the nose', Norwegian 'nesen') called Camilla. Hence Kabila Laurent
can represent both Camilla for 12 August as well as KabelLengde. Camilla's family
name (Aukrust) is also similar to 'Laurent'.
Kabila was assassinated probably short time after my email (from an Internet
cafe, not from my own account) to the US State Department. Kursk was allegedly
sunk on a time point which was one second after my email to Arundhati Roy -
I personally doubt the time data on the seismic data from the Norwegians, and
the time is anyhow one hour from Murmansk time (since Lithuania does not use
summer time), but the time point looks the same - with one second's interval.
If Kabila was shot by mobile phoning via the tapped Internet cafe short time
after my email to the US state department, the pattern is similar to the one
which was presented for Kursk.
Assume that Kabila was assassinated in order to pirate the evidential value
in my diary fragment from 12 September 1994. Then there is an additional reason
for the Hebei blasts: The distance from the beginning of that diary entry to
the word 'kabellengde' is approximately the same as the distance from the end
of the diary entry to the word 'hebe', which I used also in a quote from Bleuler
on 'hebephrenia'. The diary entry analyses a text written by a schizophrenic,
which motivates the reference to Shijiazhuang ('schizofren', Norwegian for 'schizophrenic')
and Hebei ('hebefren'). The point would be to create an artificial and flatulental
(of the most sickening kind) 'mid point phenomenon', relating the Hebei blasts
at the end of the text to the Kabila assassination at the beginning of the text.
Hebei should then be some sort of Cole. The time difference between Kursk and
Cole was 2 months (12 August and 12 October). The time difference between Kabila
and Hebei is the same: 2 months between 16 January and 16 March. See http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/africa/05/23/congo.kabila/index.html
and "2nd proof' below..
My diary fragment with the 'Dirty Beast in the Revelation' was 12 September
1994 between 12 August and 12 October. Is there anything interesting in my diary
on 16 February 1995, between 16 January and 16 March? Since Norwegian authorities
(the Bergen mafia) stole the manuscripts from my computer, and their pathetic
attempts to be similar to other people (a tragic country, this) could motivate
the 16 February entry, there are reasons to ask. The entry (see appendix "1/0")
consists of three parts reminiscent of my book "A deep ratch", and
the mid part of the diary entry contains a mention of Cantor's diagonal uncountability
proof, referring to my idea that the set of subsets is countable (not bigger
than N) after all. The 'mid point phenomenon', the middle line in the text,
is this: "The set is countable - but then where is the failure in Cantor's
proof?" I had presented the 'dirty beast' fragment as a proof that the
project is mine, and here is the 'proof' which is not valid after all (as was
the idea I referred to in the diary). This may have several functions here:
It may be intended to indicate that my proof (in the 'Dirty Beast' from the
diary) is not valid, and it may refer to the idea that Hedelund, a 'diagonal'
infinite paradox of the grove on the infinite plain, is not valid as paradox,
which should suggest that perhaps it should be called Heggebakken - as Telenor
perhaps suggests - instead. Finally, the diagonal proof suggests a Jagland
proof.
Some Norwegians with access to my unpublished but stolen diary must have jumped
to the text right after I had sent out my 'proof' on 8 January to find something
to counterbalance it with. The present case is similar to the Torre de Cali
case (see below) by attempting to turn my diary (in Cali by the author Bodil
Stenseth who occurs in that diary) against myself.
There is now much evidence in favour of the view that this would be a case of
state terrorism, and that Norway must be labelled a rogue state indeed.
Conclusion to the diary entry (given below): There is not much doubt that the
first part of this diary entry, the '1', is represented rather well with 'Laurent
Kabila', not the least since 'lÂ-o ronka
bila' means 'lay and masturbated the cars', which has much to do with the first
third of the text. The third part is perhaps typical of the interests and reality
of schizophrenics, which could add to the reason for Shijiazhuang in Hebei.
When this is used for pirating my project (on global signifi-cation by diachrony
in synchrony) by one assassination and one large-scaled bombing leaving at least
108 dead, a part of the reason why this is efficient is that the diary is an
unpublished part of my authorship and the effect of it lies in the diachrony,
while the Norwegian state is building itself around my authorship. Then it is
difficult to discover the connection to Norway.
As to the indexing by dormitories in Hebei, it can be noticed that there have
been some dormitory massacres, such as in Algeria, which seem to relate to the
Monkeybiz Project.
The sad thing, in addition to the human tragedies, is that my excellent project,
which I have worked with for one to two decades and which was meant to be for
the global community, is used for such horrible nationalistic ends. Stoltenberg
may sell a few hotdogs extra, and that is it. Since I cannot find words which
cover their meanness appropriately, I see that there is a definite danger for
the country of Norway ahead.
The Omagh bomb on 15 August 1998
There are good reasons to assume that the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania
were bombed on 7th of August in order to support the pirating of my PhD (my
authorship) by the Monkeybiz Project. It is likely that this pirating was supported
also by the Omagh bomb in Ireland on 15 August, 8 days later. The socalled Real
IRA claimed responsibility for this worst terrorist acts in the Northern Ireland
conflict. The Real IRA was allegedly formed in February-March 1998 (after having
split with IRA in 1997), which means that the formation must have been around
the time of the formation of some parts of the Monkeybiz Project, such as those
activities based on my PhD dissertation from December 1997, after the Monkeybiz
Project started by my Pilot Study application in the summer or autumn 1997.
Colm Murphy has been suspected for the Omagh bomb. The name rewrites to something
similar to "Endmorgan". So does the town name 'Monaghan' (with a certain
role in the story) as well. There are two so-called "front groups"
or "political pressure groups" in the Real IRA - the "32 County
Sovereignty Movement" and the "Irish Republican Prisoner Welfare Association"
(CNN) - these also have names reminiscent of my first publication (to legal
deposit): " 32 sonnets - John Grover". In short, there are reasons
to believe that the Real IRA is but a form of the terrorist organization serving
the Monkeybiz Project. The Real IRA has had many sympathizers and received much
funds from the USA, where it has now been outlawed as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
There is evidence in favor of the view that the US embassy bombs on 7 August
1998 was arranged by the Monkeybiz Project in order to represent the concept
of Ronk Kusa, and
the date represents the name Siv-Ellen Kraft, abbreviated to SEK for
"Senter for europeiske kulturstudier" at the University of Bergen.
SEK is a centre for european culture studies led by Siri Meyer whose
name was represented also in the Chinese embassy bombing (for 'Beijing')
on 7 May 1999. The Omagh bomb on 15 August is likely to have supported
this terrorism on the morph SEK by a text from my book "The slades with
the only turn" (book 2 in The Endmorgan Quartet) which I published to legal
deposit and to Poetry Library (and sent to some people) in April 1998. The text
is this:
Luke 24.44: in the Law of Moses,
the Prophets and the Psalms
Events Sekshne Sa
Linda hang something up just,
but I have tried to find -
but I have somebody to tell me that I'm moving out.
I'm guffing in for the novel husband.
We haven't felt guilty.
I went away from my rooting place.
Do you have much of these?
Yes, disturbed, but of the BB:
White behind, black shepherd.
That gives black-o-mag in the last/past.
I jade in the air delision/division of neighbours.
I overlay with him.
I have restored one should-one,
and I got daddy-text.
Events Sekshne Sa 22 Jan
Here is black-o-mag, for the black Omagh - in the plastic. Subtracting SEK from
the signature Events Sekshne Sa leaves something close to Evensen USA. Evensen
(linguist at the university in Trondheim) was in the committee which rejected
my Pilot Study application in 1997, that application to the research council
(the rejection of it, that is) which the Monkeybiz Project was based on. This
adds Evensen USA for Rejection USA as an application correlate to Ronk
Kusa in the US embassy bombs. Hence the Omagh bomb strongly reinforced the Ronk
Kusa symbolism, as a correlate to Ronk
Roever in the Moscow bombs a year later. Also, the date 15 August once again
reinforces the name Siv-Ellen Kraft for SEK.
The first line - 'Linda hang something up just' - seems to represent the PhD
which also had just been rejected (in a letter dated 27 July 1998). Peter Mandelson
also resigned in Christmas 1998 partly due to a free flight with a lingerie
billionaire whose name was Linda something (Wachler, I think it was, something
like that).
In short, the Omagh bomb supports the Monkeybiz Project. I notice that the bomb
took place while an exhibition with Lithuanian sculpture was arranged in Bergen
(13-30 August 1998) which seemed to imitate the first page from my then three
books in The Endmorgan Quartet, and "The slades with the only turn"
was also represented. It was this plagiarizing exhibition, curated by Kostas
Bogdanas, which was opened by Landsbergis, with piano music (Lands Piano Bergis)
and speech. Hence the imitation of a text from this book in the Omagh bomb would
have support from the imitating exhibition (monkeybiz exhibition) in Bergen.
- Landsbergis' party was reduced from 69 to 9 parliament seats in the next election.
A large exhibition of design at Henie-Onstad Art Centre at Oslo in the same
summer also represented the important names in the preparation for the Monkeybiz
Project, including Siv-Ellen Kraft's and my names. There were some such activities
which strongly support this interpretation of the Omagh bomb as a part of the
activities of the Monkeybiz Project. I guess that the two exhibitions (Henie-Onstad
in Oslo, Bergens Kunstforening in Bergen) may have been planned around that
time when the Real IRA allegedly for was formed. The one at Henie-Onstad was
based on research paid by the Research Council (several years ago), said the
catalogue.
The Omagh bomb was also right after the second 'attempt', on 12 August, against
the Pausts in Oslo. The first had been on 15 July, with dynamite (without ignition
mechanism) under the car. 12 August is also the date of Kursk, the birth of
my niece Camilla (cp. Kabila), and the mirror point on the other side of my
mother's birth relative to the first Madonna apparition in Lourdes - for the
Dirty Beast in the Revelation. There are the patterns 12 August (Kursk) and
12 October (Cole), and 16 January (Kabila) and 16 March (Hebei). And here 15
July (Paust dynamite 'attempt') and 15 August (Omagh). The question then presents
itself if there is anything interesting on 15 September or 15 June. There is,
on 15 June. The news are on http://www.nettavisen.no/servlets/page?section=2&item=33257
about Statoil and the socalled Jostein Gaarder's prize given to the Nigerian
organization ERA. Three of its members were to arrive in Oslo to receive the
prize - 750.000 kroner which is about the sum I could have received if my Pilot
Study application had been accepted. The three prize-winners had criticized
Statoil for their engagement in Nigeria - having drilled for oil since 1993
and leaving 1 billion NOK without finding anything, they should have pulled
out and could return when democracy returns, they said. Statoil had then refused
to meet the representatives of ERA but they had changed their minds the evening
before their arrival and would arrange a meeting. The ERA was to receive the
prize on Monday (which I suppose is 15 June 1998).
12 September is the date when I wrote my Dirty Beast in the Revelation diary
fragment in 1994. One could expect a reference to something relevant for the
Monkeybiz Project on that date (12 September 2000) if the hypothesis holds good.
I have searched a little and found: http://www.nettavisen.no/servlets/page?section=3&item=119790
tells a story of an excorcism by the Pope himself by a mass in the Vatican a
week or so earlier. A teenager suddenly started screaming. The devil occurred
not on 12 September, but the story was told on that day in Nettavisen - which
suggests a reference to the concept of "Dirty Beast in the Revelation"
for the Madonna in Lourdes on the other side of my mother's birth and 30666
days after my father's birth. Hence the story in Nettavisen on 12 September
2000 tells that even the Cole date of 12 October 2000 was well known in Nettavisen
on 12 September 2000. Summary:
15 June 1998 Jostein Gaarder prize to ERA, relates to Statoil in
the news
15 July 1998 'Attempt' against Per and Anne Paust
15 Aug 1998 Omagh bomb, allegedly by the Real IRA
12 Aug 2000 Kursk (12 Aug 1998 second 'attempt' against the Pausts)
12 Sept 2000 Dirty Beast proof in my diary, Nettavisen tells of papal excorcism
12 Oct 2000 Cole
16 Jan 2001 Kabila
16 Febr 2001 Bus bomb in Podujevo, my diary fragment on Cantor's proof
16 March 2001 Hebei bombs
I suppose this is a pattern which can be recognized in other terrorist acts
by the Monkeybiz Project. There are the same clear traces of Norwegian state
terrorism in the Omagh bomb, for the SEK at Bergen university, as in the other
wellknown cases.
What is the SEK?
The bombing of the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam as well as of Omagh
and the Chinese embassy in Belgrade seem to have their only rationale in representing
the morph SEK and the name 'Siri Meyer'. Why? The SEK seems to be the onset
of "the SECond coming of Christ", for "the SEK and coming of
Christ". In my Pilot Study application, the rejection of which is the beginning
of the Monkeybiz Project, I outline the background for my project in the work
I had done up to then, and which led me to postulate five points as basis for
the project I applied for:
1) There is a submorphemic level of grammar and signification
2) This grammar and signification addresses cyclic time (beyond the synchrony,
that is)
3) It refers to states and events in the shared social consciousness as a collective
narrative
4) It transcends Turing-computability
5) Its cultural representation is poetic
I had (in my "Submorphemic signification" which I wrote mainly in
1993-1994) reached the conclusion that there is a level of submorphemic significatiofn
which is active even in adult language. In that book, I prove that there necessarily
must exist such a level of signification. This is a far deeper cultural problem
than just the surface linguistic theory. In the book I wrote later ("Time
and the sonnet") as part of the project I had applied for (but got no money
for), I show that the morpheme boundary, represented in linguistic theory by
the socalled principle of double articulation which assumes that there is no
semantic structure below the morpheme, is culturally interpreted by Christ on
the cross. It entails that the first coming of Christ is the same as the cultural
establishment of the morpheme boundary. I had reached this conclusion on basis
of studies in culture, linguistics and technology history in "The history
of linguistics and information technology" which I wrote in 1992-1993,
mainly at "Centre for culture and technology" in Oslo. I sent a copy
of it to Siri Meyer who then had taken over as leader of the "Centre for
european culture studies" in Bergen and hoped for financing of the further
work. I got no financing, but when I came to the university of Bergen in the
autumn 1995, the centre led by Meyer arranged a seminar which was based on the
ideas in my study - without mention of me.
In the mean time, I had completed "Submorphemic signification" and
had every chance to conclude that the breakdown of the morpheme boundary is
taboo and leads to rejection of whoever ventures the idea in Christian culture,
since it means that Christ steps down from the cross. I supposed that that also
was part of the reason why they (with Siri Meyer) started pirating my ideas
in "The history of linguistics and information technology" instead
of supporting me, since such pirating is a hallmark of the alphabetic monkeybiz
culture. Anybody who ventilates the idea that there exists a submorphemic signification
risks being crucified in protestant state-church Norway, I concluded. Hence
when I sent my Pilot Study application to the Norwegian research council in
1997, I had to add the following observation:
"Each individual subjective reality interacts with this shared consciousness,
and each subjective reality is unique. This is the religious aspect of
the reorientation which the computer age will induce - a point which should
be considered rationally and without hysterical overinterpretations (that is,
I am neither Christ nor Anti-Christ). It has the corollary that subjects generate
their own subjective reality through the information technology in interaction
with the shared consciousness. This is creative writing".
I suppose this is the background for the whole Monkeybiz Project and
the SEK: That morph should represent both Siri Meyer at SEK in Bergen (including
the pirating attempt going back to 1994 or at least 1995) as well as the 'submorphemic'
onset of the "second coming of Christ", reducing that coming to SEK
(Siri Meyer) and the traditional coming of the first Christ. The heavy terrorism
on the morph SEK can be seen as an attempt to pirate the second coming of Christ.
The whole complex, including the disastrous development of it into state pirating
of authorship by means of state terrorism, can be understood as a matter of
breakdown of the morphemic boundary. My point (also in the application) was
that this breakdown takes place in order to give way for a larger poetic reality
(including a larger poetic science) in the arbitrary sentential sign. That also
means the second coming of Christ.
The reactionary monkeybizers in Norway, where the alphabetic protestatism and
state church (one of the very few state churches left in the world) relies heavily
on the morphemic boundary even politically, tried to pirate the poetic science
application by all means, including the composition of the government, postal
code revision, state terrorism etc., and in doing so, they imitated my ideas
(such as the 'mid point phenomenon' for the diachronic description, which I
had prepared for e.g. in my diary studies) without being aware of the fact that
these ideas came from my preparatory work and not from themselves. That is the
monkeybiz culture which they tried to save. The new time is about knowing the
difference between mine and yours. The reason why the monkeybizers have received
so much support is that they seem to defend traditional Christian values
- which of course they do not, with all their terror-and-monkeybiz. It is the
new technology which makes for this turn. To defend traditional Christian values
with terror and monkeybiz is to defend the alphabet against the threat from
the computer. It is the Norwegian protestant state-church which does so, and
it is a deeply reactionary force which seems to find its support in the best-acknowledged
Western values. The mystery is how it could come about that this bunch of bandits
could find so much support, and the reason is probably that we are still on
the verge to a new defining technology.
But the whole thing is a misunderstanding and it is high time to stop the monkeybiz
and terrorism madness and give me money to do the project I applied for.
The Pope's visit to Syria and the pirate attempt
In the beginning of May 2001, Pope John Paul II travelled in the footsteps of
St.Paul, from Greece to Syria (Damascus) and to Malta. On this trip, he visited
the shrine where St.John the Baptist's head, according to tradition, is kept,
next to the grave of the famous Kurd Saladin, and came to be the first head
of the Catholic church to step into a mosque, the one at Saladin's tomb. When
doing this, he represented my book title "Birds to Saladin", the second
book in the large Endmorgan Quartet. It is about the poetic function and how
this relates to or is identical with divine revelation, and I have come to understand
that the book represents the third Fatima secret - told by the Madonna to Lucia
dos Santos in 1917 some months after my father's birth - a text which the Pope
made official on 13 May and 26 June 2000 after having kept it secret after the
Vatican received it from Lucia around the time of my birth. Hence Pope John
Paul II's visit and entry into the mosque is a very strong support for my authorship.
It seems as if the Norwegian monkeybizers have tried to pirate this support
in a somewhat elaborate terrorist initiative, consisting of at least the following
elements: The bombing of Hotel Torre de Cali in Cali in Colombia, the shooting
to death of Barbara Ann Ford in Guatemala City and of Manuel Giminez (Abad)
in San Sebastian. There may have been other elements in the cluster, but I delimit
the discussion to these three.
Hotel Torre de Cali
This followed after the Easter terror which included the shooting of the Russian
KFOR soldier Mikhael Shiutsev (on a postwar buffer strip) under the Norwegian
Torgeir
Skiaker's command, the Nova Scotia train derailment the day after in Stewiacke
(for 'tog-greier skiaker'), the Pristina car bomb which was announced by a telephone
call to me earlier in the morning, the Homesh bomb, the Conoco blast at 2:22
responding to the 4:44 of the Concorde imitating a 'mid point phenomenon', etc.)
at least partly represented my text "The lane is that which is new to a
bus" (see below, signed 'The Homished'). The Easter terror followed immediately
after the rejection of my application for author stipend, a rejection made by
a committee led by Bodil
Stenseth. There are some reasons why this rejection probably is systematically
related to the bombing of Hotel Torre de Cali and to the pirating of the Pope's
trip to Syria and his visit to John the Baptist's shrine and Saladin's tomb
the day after. Stenseth is mentioned in my diary as one of the few people mentioned
by full name, and when she rejects my application, the trend in the rest of
the Monkeybiz Project makes it appear that it is my own diary which rejects
me. That is in line with the government's policy. Whether it was her acquaintance
Stoltenberg's
idea to have her as leader of the committee, I don't know, but the effect of
the rejection was anyhow to support the terrorist state. This explains the choice
of Cali, since Stenseth has written a book with the title "Kali",
while the Pope's visit was a strong support for my book title "Birds
to Saladin". If that was the choice of Cali for the bomb, the choice
of Hotel Torre de Cali was motivated by the following fragment from my book
"Birds to Saladin" (pages 206 and 207):
Exodus 15.26: "if you pay attention to his commands and
keep all his decrees, I will not bring on you any of the diseases I brought
on the Egyptians, for I am the Lord, who heals you".
As in the textens of bell car,
your look
(vest versus best) go
the obizm,
a sable search og English literature.
4. tenke [written by hand] 27 Feb
Blue thing / pluething -
it's what I can count to serve,
what I can count to serve,
serving the streng to leave,
is what I can grip to happen,
counting from first Christmas day.
[THUNDER]
Kari
Exodus 15.27: Then they came to Elim, where there were twelve
springs and seventy palm trees,
The lane is that which is new to a bus.
The sky - put a price to it!
The world refeeter net.
Do four types type the handsome roller?
Want to celebrate Munda,
is easy to find a correlate parallel to
the poet Laura Smith
in the window and the states
which are thrown out.
The Homished 28 Feb
The second of these texts was a sort of undertext for the Easter terror,
whether deliberately made or not, and there was a remarkable comment from nature
in the sudden White Christmas on Easter morning here in Vilnius: For a few hours
on Easter morning, every millimeter of Vilnius was covered with white snow,
and everything was black and white, before spring returned. It looked just like
Christmas day, as in the text next to the one which was undertext for the Easter
terror. I commented on this in my letters on the Easter terror. It is then likely
that the Monkeybiz Project wanted to pirate the nature poetry which my texts
relate to, including the Endmorgan comment from nature with Christmas on Easter
morning in Vilnius, and they have chosen to do so by commenting on the end of
the first text where the reference to Christmas day is. Hence they represent
"....Christmas day. THUNDER. Kari" by means of Hotel Torre de Cali
- which then establishes a link between the bomb at Torre de Cali, Stenseth's
book title "Kali", and my book title "Birds to Saladin"
which the Pope had made a representation of with his visit to St.John the Baptist's
head shrine next to Saladin's grave.
 |
Norwegian secret agents turn Easter into Christmas. |
This bomb at Hotel Torre de Cali in the night to Saturday 5 May was step 1 in
the attempted pirating of the Pope's support to my authorship. Step 2 was the
shooting to death of Barbara Ann Ford, a Sister of Charity nun, in Guatemala
City later that Saturday, and step 3 was the shooting to death of Manuel Giminez
in Zaragoza in Spain approximately at the time when the Pope stepped into the
mosque on Sunday 6 May. Before proceeding with these, it can be wise to read
the appendix on "Antarctica" which I wrote on 15 April, Easter Day,
while the snow covered the landscape outside the window. That text was probably
an important part of the reason for the pirating attempt after I had sent it
around to various people and places. It relates the eternal ice of Antarctica,
the eternal eyes of apparition technology, to the eternal city of Jerusalem.
Pope John Paul II has suggested that the eternal city be turned into an international
protectorate, while the suggestion in the piece of writing "Antarctica"
below follows upon that for the eternal ice. The name John Paul the Second also
rewrites to South Pole blockhead (see the appendix) when the nasals are removed,
for Antarctica as the road to Paradise, with the earthen institution and formalization.
My book title "Birds to Saladin" also reads "Jerusalem"
on a deep level - related probably to Antarctica. Hence there is a strong link
to the Pope and his visit to Syria in this Antarctica text which I wrote on
Easter Day. That is probably the background for the cases of Barbara Ann Ford
on 5 May and Manuel Giminez on 6 May.
Barbara Ann Ford and Manuel Giminez
Manuel Giminez (whose full name seems to be Manuel Giminez Abad) was on his
way to a football match on Sunday 6 May together with his son when he was shot
down, and he represented Partido Popular. It is his political position
which is the essential point here, while his name represents the links to Madonna
and the Vatican through my father who had the same name as me but was born John
Jensen in 1916, at the time when the Angel of Portugal visited Lucia dos Santos
in preparation for the Madonna apparition some months later in Fatima. My father
was born in ‰lesund, a name which means 'eel-strait' and hence refers to Sargasso.
Manuel Giminez lived in Zaragoza, where there also was a Madonna apparition
which has been accepted by the Vatican. Ronk
Grøver is a sensible interpretation of his and my name, and when he was
born John Jensen, that makes the similarity to Manuel Giminez obvious. The point
would be to establish a connection to the Vatican and the Pope's visit to Syria.
Barbara Ann Ford was a nun, a Sister of Charity, who was shot by apparent car
robbers in Guatemala City on Saturday 5 May. They tried to steal her car after
having shot her but gave up and left it in the street - probably in an attempt
to represent my name.
The reason for Guatemala City is probably to be found in Prudence Bushnell,
the US ambassador to Guatemala, who was ambassador to Kenya when the embassy
in Nairobi was bombed by the monkeybizers on 7 August 1998. I had sent her an
email some time ago about that bombing.
The reference to Bushnell and Giminez' political party opens for a renewed interpretation:
Last year, I made some scriptures on the socalled Buba-radio (a radio sending
out the keystrokes as I write) that I thought could be in my Toshiba laptop.
I wrote about it in ambiguous terms, assuming that it could either be a telepathic
device or in fact even a device planted in the laptop by the secret services
in Bergen (which of course it also could). The term arose last year after I
had written on the keyboard about "Hubba Bubba, king of the kingkings"
with a hard drive I never used when attached to the net, and Clinton in the
Okinawa meeting a day or two after spoke jocularly about himself as having the
email username "dcBubba". There is a shared reference to Buba-radio
in the two events: Prudence Bushnell and Barbara in Guatemala City have onsets
for Buba-Buba, and Giminez represented Partido Popular, for Popa.
Now for the clue: The relevance of the Buba-radio motivates the form BUBA: Subtracting
this from the names Prudence Bushnell and Partido Populare (the contexts of
the two victims) leaves Denceshnell + rtidopulare, which here comes out as The
National Polar Territory. Hence the two cases seem to represent that the national
territorial claims for the eternity of the South Pole blockhead (including the
support from Pope John Paul II for my authorship that day) has been turned into
a national territory. That represents the national pirating of the support for
my authorship by the national state terrorism of Norway. I suppose that was
the reason for the two tragedies, and I suppose that the Norwegian government
may be held responsible for it: If they have not planned and paid for it themselves,
which they well may have done (compare the below evidence from Israel), they
know very well what is going on and should have stopped it long ago. Also, the
bombing of Hotel Torre de Cali was supported by such things as a newspaper article
written by a Helge Baardset (name similar to Bodil Stenseth) about Norwegian
authors in Copenhagen (my mention of Stenseth in my diary is restricted to the
comment that she is an author and lived in Copenhagen), with introductory mention
of Bombay and Hotel du Nord in Istedsgade (the bombing of Hotel Torre de Cali)
and the author's terrifying experiences there, while the publisher address "Klareboderne
3" represents a clear reference to "Bodil Stenseth: Kali". This
article appeared on Dagsavisen's Internet edition in the same morning as the
bomb exploded outside Hotel Torre de Cali. I suppose it has been arranged by
the Norwegian monkeybiz 'networks' providing information on what is appropriate
pieces of information to put into writing and publishing for the day, in order
to create the "terror-and-monkeybiz" policy which now seems to dominate
Norway. It is a policy which arranges terror a la the Hotel Torre de Cali bomb
and then installs the representation of it in official Norwegian institutions
in order to tap the global community of its historic support. It is like stealing.
Not much to be proud of.
There is a further motivation for Barbara Ann Ford in the name of the police
officer who handled my application for renewal of residence permit some weeks
ago. The name is very similar to Ford's. Her position is also somewhat like
Bodil Stenseth's even if I got my application accepted. But I had a feeling
that she knew about the tricks of the norsies.
Ford was a "Sister of Charity" nun. The attack happened not so many
hours after the bomb at Hotel Torre de Cali which represented "...Christmas
Day. / THUNDER / Kari" in the below text. That text is at the end of part
3 of my book "Birds to Saladin". At the corresponding place in the
beginning, there is the text which also has given the title to that part 3:
"A sister of Toukhraud". I suppose that is "A sister of Charity"
(Barbara Ann Ford). The title text has given rise to some very interesting nature
poetry in England.
The Buba-radio
How did I find out that the "Buba-radio" was a relevant concept for
interpreting the Barbara Ann Ford and Manuel Giminez cases? Saturday night,
after Ford but before Giminez, I wrote a letter to the Norwegian Parliament
(by the political parties there). It had this heading:
Subject: The car bomb at Hotel Torre di Cali explained
Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 02:16:43 +0200
From: John Grover <john.grover@takas.lt>
To: hoyre.postmottak@stortinget.no, venstre.postmottak@stortinget.no, ap.postmottak@stortinget.no,
sp.postmottak@stortinget.no, sv.postmottak@stortinget.no, krf.postmottak@stortinget.no,
frp.postmottak@stortinget.no, steinar.bastesen@stortinget.no, anniken@auf.no,
rv@rv.no
I wrote that letter at night. I had gone to sleep and risen again, and then
wrote it in the night to Sunday. I opened Windows, wrote the letter and sent
it off to Norway, after which I closed Windows and went back to bed. The same
night, a man who was a patient in a psychiatric clinic in V‰xjˆ /
Ljungby in Sweden also got up from bed, opened the Window, left a letter on
the table allegedly saying that he had to go out and injure children (at least
according to the Norwegian source www.nettavisen.no),
and slipped out of the Window which he closed before he escaped. Later that
Sunday, around eleven o'clock before noon, he attacked a six year old girl in
a playground with an axe and injured her severely in the head. The girl suffered
no fractures or brain damage and she will recover from the injuries. The man
fled on a bike and was hunted by the police who finally caught him, still with
the axe, and they had to beat him down with their batons.
I suppose that is the Buba-radio. My name on the form Ohn Barne Røver
(onset-truncated) means precisely Evil Child Robber, so that is what he wrote
in his letter to the authorities. The axe is an iron-edge which is the 'jarn-egg'
part of my name. Hence all my three names John, Bjarne and Grover were onset-truncated
here - just like the Bu-Ba from the names Prudence Bushnell, Barbara and Partido
Populare. There is also a strong reference to the Blockhead and to St.John the
Baptist in the sad event. The correlation between the man and my letter is evidenced
in the Norwegian Parliament's email archive and in the news from Sweden that
Sunday. This happened after Barbara Ann Ford was shot in Guatemala, but before
Giminez around the time when Pope John Paul II entered the mosque at Saladin's
grave.
There is another element of Buba-radio here as well: At the end of the letter,
after having discussed the insane bombing and terrorism which the norses seem
to have inflicted on the world, and producing a tame "admit the problem
and vow to fight against it", I added the line: "No, stop the nonsense!
One more assassination is one too much". I then deleted it again since
there had already been too many assassinations, but the "nonsense"
stuck to my mind and that is what I first noticed when I later that day read
the news about the "US nun". My first thought when I saw the headline
on CNN was that it referred to the "nonsense" I had just written but
deleted - and hence it would have had to have escaped my Toshiba laptop by Buba-radio
(or a virus program) before I deleted it. I then discovered that it had happened
before I wrote the word - but that is anyhow the reason why I came to consider
the Buba-radio. Which probably was the reason for the whole terrorist arrangement
- since that Buba-radio is the meaning of the technological eternity which Antarctica
also is about.
That Buba-radio is probably also what my letter to the Norwegian parliament
was about. My project is about the larger poetic reality, which I suppose the
psychiatric patient also is concerned with, and the business terrorists are
obsessed with suppressing and pirating that reality. The Norwegian monkeybizers
are trying to build an Empire of Evil by monkeybizing on my poetic project.
Then I get up at night and write a letter to the Norwegian parliament that this
must stop, and a psychiatric patient in Sweden does the same and proves the
poetic reality in the Buba-radio. The Sister of Charity Barbara Ann Ford was
shot by the monkeybizers in order to make a reference to that bomb in Cali which
my letter was about by way of the Buba-radio concept, as a means for the monkeybizers
to pirate the Pope's support for my authorship.
The larger poetic reality is the development forwards in the third millenium,
while the terrorist monkeybizers are the reactionary evil forces striving back
to the darkness of the previous millenium, including such stubbornness as forced
psychiatric treatment. (The evil norses also treated me with that and I suppose
a part of the reason for the patient's role here is that I am registered as
'chronically paranoid' in their registers - because I believe that they are
monkeybizing on my work and indexing me in the media). The Norwegian terrorist
monkeybizers call me a madman because I am working for a larger poetic reality
with peaceful coexistence. That Norwegian society is indeed insane.
A final observation on the Barbara Ann Ford case: If Buba-radio is the key,
then the radio applies probably to 'radius and ulna', for the bones in the 'under-arms'.
'Ulna' would then probably apply to 'Ulla' as in the Hebei blasts. The skeleton
landscape of Antarctica, where Norway has made some territorial claims, is the
essence of the story here. The skeleton landscape is, as is my idea, the formalized
diachrony which also is the key to the Buba-radio. Now claim backwards
is melk, for the Buba. That points also to my title text for The Endmorgan
Quartet, where there is the line "I 've been giving you melk".
Conclusion: The three terrorist attacks against Hotel Torre de Cali, Barbara
Ann Ford and Manuel Giminez served to pirate the Pope's support for my authorship
in his historic representation of my book title "Birds to Saladin",
the book about the poetic function and divine revelation (the return of Christ).
The link to Bodil Stenseth in the Norwegian committee and the Norwegian newspaper
article suggests that it can hardly be others than Norwegians behind the terrorism.
The man who injured the little girl with the axe committed suicide some days
later. On the 15th of May, I had to pay down on the education loan from the
Norwegian state because I had not yet received a letter saying that it could
be postponed. It was a huge part of the small money I have left, and paying
those money which the state has defined as payment for the Africa bombs nearly
amounted to suicide for my project. I suppose the norses were happy that they
could destroy my project. The next morning, the man committed suicide.
Norwegian FM Jagland in Israel
On 9 May in the morning, two Israeli youths, one of them also a US citizen,
the son of Mandell as for Mandelson, the other called Yosif Ish-Ran
as for Jagland, were found beaten to death in a cave at the Judean border
by the desert, on one side of a dried-out riverbed. Their heads had been smashed
(Jerusalem Post) and their blood had been smeared over the inside of the cave
(for the semantics of 'tor'). They had gone hiking the day before and did not
return. During the night, 100 goats were also stolen from a nearby farm. The
day before, I had sent a letter to the Norwegian ministry of trade with the
evidence that the national Norwegian telecom company Telenor seemed to be involved
in the Hebei bombs in China on 16 March and in the assassination of Laurent
Kabila on 16 January, with the comment that the new board in Telenor which was
to be elected two days later ought not to carry on those traditions. This was
also the day when Norwegian Foreign Minister Thorbjørn Jagland arrived
in Israel on behalf of the socalled Mitchell committee, with a draft which could
contribute to the peace process. Jagland's name means 'two-bear huntland' (or
'Thor' means 'the other, the double, the second'), and hence the two dead in
the cave as well as the stolen goats represent his name extremely well and there
cannot be much doubt about that explicit reference. In addition, there is the
reference to my "Mandelson and the Poet Laureate", and when one of
the youths was son of Mandell and the other was Yosif Ish-Ran, it appears that
the story about "Mandelson and Jagland" puts Jagland in the position
of the nature poet. Somebody may have asked to have it done (by locals or whoever
was willing to do it for money) in order to represent his name at the time of
his arrival in Israel, is my conclusion. Furthermore, 100 goats represent 'quotes
of mail' while the two youths in the cave represent my authorship: The two youths
are also reminiscent of the two youths who crossed the river and returned again
in Xenophon's story about the Carduchians (who may have been the Kurds), used
as parallel text to my text in my book "...to be an emperor..."
(only that the two youths here did not return again over the dried-out riverbed).
It therefore represented Jagland's name (for the Norwegian government) and my
authorship, typically in line with the Norwegian pirating policy when they try
to build their "terror-and-monkeybiz" by representing my authorship
with their political indexing at home and by terror abroad. Here are the relevant
passages - Xenophon's in large type in italics, mine in small ordinary type:
Xenophon: And they [the two young men] told him that they had
been collecting dry sticks as firewood to a fire, and then they observed on
the other side an old man, a woman and some young girls coming down the cliff
with a bag of clothes to hide in a cave in the rocks.
His new director with the art of culture,
so the rest of the book handles of Peter, the song.
And I don't know if there is any ending there:
That Peter of the Owl, that kinds me -
but stories of how the rough-bed
(accenting the roughbed etc.)
projecting seg, fra Bastaloira
in Moansland, the highest part.
That means that any such has got -
are laty
make
in year 39.
IT ideologies:
I think I wrote any detailed studies
of other reasons that Mark explained: Hey!
And the Lord trained on the eastern side.
So whatever Kongeby or Langeby or Snikk-Snakk
rather than emotional,
I had derided to talk
if
it lives on here,
while I suggest
that nobody/people
libertian.
Xenophon: They saw that it was safe to cross, since the horse-men
could not come down to that place.
While if something is stocking to move,
that's all I've got: All but a lei seg - [All but a sorry]
what form is it in?
All but a few couple of years ago -
that gives an excellent option
of looking for The Third Way
among places.
Xenophon: So they stripped their clothes off and took only
a dagger in hand to swim over to the other side;
This function of the same
is in need of somebody who tells me trust.
Society can.
It is no doubt that the ministry opted for the use of "variability",
but squarer would be raddling the tooler,
somebody to inform.
That is, somebody to expect
the window of your soul
under a cottage which is as follows:
After the elephant, wristen at 'C',
to smile to Mr.Bone,
that the man has sold a roughlin' tip.
The large land measurement project on VaterlandÖ
- does he need the author of author line?
Ömarked of the green dissolution, the hail
and I am raised with many birds
of the war sing out yer Tarantula,
and had written to the forest
en UTAH
combusted to cost.
There is but craft.
Oisan
Xenophon: and they could walk over to the other side without
even wetting their waists. Having crossed, they took the clothes and returned
immediately.
The fairy wheel of a rosy concert -
fiefdom -
the names, because it's histories: John,
because they are the histories.
If batterday has come to an end
except when I feel entirely fit for that -
you, too -
he believes that you also have
gambled with the homely king,
lends his power to use it in,
and, as the king
sister, I'm so tried, but one
death lies there in order not to be
discovered/annoyed by the secret police,
even if I could.
Old Carrera
The parallel text from Xenophon is obviously relevant to the two Israeli youths
in the cave, and hence the sad event represents Jagland's name and my authorship.
It may be observed also that 'xeno-' means 'foreign', and hence the 'foreign
phone' also can have the meaning of 'long-distance phone' for TELELINJE representing
Telenor - see below. Or simply Telephone.
Norwegian state terrorism in the Middle East
On the sad event with the two youths in the cave, it is wise to consider it
seriously that there may be Norwegian interesters behind, such as Telenor or
possibly even the government itself, just as may be the case for the infant
girl Shalhevet Pass, who was shot on a playground by a sniper with a long-distance
lens, called TELELINSE in Norwegian. The word for the cable connections which
Telenor uses, and which can be called Kabellengde with reference to Kabila and
my diary entry, is TELELINJE. The minimal opposition, which I recognize also
because it is explicitly mentioned in another part of my diary (for 1 June 1996),
plays with the word Kabellengde which seems to have been a major motivation
for the assassination of Kabila, and which seems to be linked to Telenor. (I
also notice that the names of Shalhevet's parents also together make for roughly
'Laurent Kabila', and the date 26 March and some other things support the theory
of a connection, cp. also the car bombing of the cook Ramon Diaz Garcia in San
Sebastian on 26 January, probably for Ragna Dasspapir meaning Ragna Loopaper
for my mother's name).
If TELELINSE and TELELINJE was a basic minimal opposition e.g. from my diary
and motivating the case, Replacing J with S in my name produces SON PSARNE GROVER,
for ZOOM PS-ARE NEGR-ROVER: 'PS' was the name which the Norwegians suggested
for the telecom merger of Telenor with the Swedish Telia (a merger which had
to be cancelled after much work because the Swedes could not stand the Norwegian
nationalism - and I suppose they had the state terrorism in mind). The name
PS was snakily presented as short for 'People of Scandinavia', but I wrote to
the Swedish government and pointed out that it was likely to represent 'Peter
Stothard' (the suggested name was then withdrawn), then editor of The Times,
who also had some role in this story. It is the same reference as to the stuttering
librarian in Bergen (Dag Vaula) in the Voula nightclub owner car bomb case some
days ago, supported also with an inherent reference to Gerd-Liv Valla ('døgnvill
valla') who took over as union leader a few days ago, and who, in this 'most
powerful position in Norway', as the first union leader has declined to be represented
in the Labour Party's central committee - no doubt a wise decision these days
when it is about getting out of Sodom and Gomorrah as fast as possible. When
PS was fired by 'Rupee' Murdoch, that is what makes this 'PS' a reference not
only to the Shalhevet Pass sniper case itself but also to Telenor and its relation
to the victim. The rest of the form then says that the zoom lens (TELELINSE
and 'murger') and this PS (TELELINJE and 'merger') are 'negr rovers', which
points to the Kabila case. Hence a further support to the assumed connection
between Shalhevet Pass and Kabila.
After I had sent out a discussion of this in some emails, there were the news
on CNN that Osama bin Laden's half-brother had been granted citizenship in Switzerland,
something which made me aware of the possible reading of the name as 'helvetes-pass',
which is a Norwegian word which means 'passport to hell'.
Also, the reference to the name Thorbjørn Jagland (in the two youths
in the cave and the stolen goats) is obvious and cannot be ignored.
That may suggest a Norwegian source. I have reported a number of cases which
seem to suggest such Norwegian origin. The two cases here from Israel are noteworthy
also by their cruelty and capacity for hurting people deeply in their feelings.
They have that same stamp of rational facefarting as the nazi crimes.
What is the purpose of this Shalhevet Pass case? I think it is wise to keep
in mind that the Norwegian reality may have changed somewhat radically since
1997, and now seems to be characterized by a very aggressive use of terrorism
in maximally effective places, such as in areas of political tension where a
small bomb or heinous act may whip up a lot of emotions and create much conflict
and political and media effect. The two youths in the cave may be such a case,
not only since the case hits precisely in the moment when Jagland arrives with
a sort of peace initiative at the same time as he is precisely indexed by the
terror, and the event naturally may lead to increased tension between Israelis
and Palestinians. To blame the Norwegian representative (from that land of humanism
and tolerance and blah-blah) when he arrives with a peace initiative may seem
like a big misunderstanding, and hence one naturally refrains from venturing
such ideas. (Also, it is mainly norses who indulge in "facefarting"
without blinking an eye). Hence the sad and disturbing event with the two youths
may lead to heavy escalation of the tension in the Middle East and thereby it
gives a lot of political effect with minimal effort.
Then it is a pity if that allows the Middle East tension to increase, if the
norses are to be blamed. But of course one cannot let this continue. I have
repeatedly called for open attention to the state terrorism from Norway and
I think it is a wise thing to pay serious attention to the possibility that
such a thing really is going on.
The day after Jagland's arrival in Israel, Telenor should get a new board, and
on the front page of the government's web site there were two news, the
first making political profits out of the US embassy bombs in 1998 (by http://www.odin.dep.no/kuf/norsk/publ/periodika
/p10001887/014081-990191/index-dok000-b-n-a.html which is something on a
'prize for education quality' given by the education minister, selected obviously
with reference to my role and the education loan and its role in those Africa
bombs), the second (http://www.odin.dep.no/ud/norsk/aktuelt/pressem/032091-070054/index-dok000-b-n-a.html)
making references (by 'ulandspolitikken') to the name Ulla Heggelund which was
indexed by the Hebei bombs in China some weeks ago. That inherent reference
to the bombs in Africa and China (more than 330 dead) is not coincidental, and
is a case of real facefarting on the government's front page, in particular
if or since the norses have made for those bombs themselves or been actively
involved in them. It has taken me some time to realize that the Norwegian state
makes frequent use of state terrorism in viking style, and uses the effect actively
and consciously to build a pirate terrorist state. Typically, the bombs could
index me and so to speak let me pay for them by the 'education loan', then they
would fill the boards and administrations with people with names similar to
mine or elements from my authorship, and put stories with such indexing on the
front pages without being willing to admit that. That is monkeybiz pirating
with terror as the driving force. It is a terrorist state which does so, and
I think there are good reasons to ask openly to what extent the Norwegian state
is working along such principles. The evidence is quite convincing.
If or when it does, then the 'best' bombs are those which hit in areas of political
tension, according to their metric. There were for example some bombs in Jakarta
last year which the Aceh
movement was blamed for, and which obviously referred to the Bergen monkeybusiness
environment - probably fuelling new political initiatives from Bergen or Oslo
by that political effect. I suppose Jakarta was selected for precisely that
reason. There was also a 'dormitory' bomb (probably four Aceh students dead)
in the suburb Guntur (may mean 'god tur' = 'have a nice trip', for example to
the two young men in the cave, also since 'kontor' means 'office') in Jakarta
the same day as Jagland arrived, very likely to refer to the dormitory bombs
in Hebei in March and which were the reference inherent in the govenment's front
page website with the article on politics on developing countries. Such things
develop into the sickest society one can think of. The current socalled 'Orderud'
case in Norway is interesting, since the obvious reason - that the assassinated
Orderud Paust (the personal secretary of the defence minister) was involved
in the Africa bombs and knew a lot about the Chinese embassy bombs when she
was assassinated two weeks later - is entirely looked apart from, and the case
receives a lot of attention in the media for the purpose of having the public
accept lies about the state of the country.
Frankly, I think that the escalation of the tension in the Middle East since
September last year has to do with this problem and the way it relates to the
rest of the world community. The case is this: If one knows about a terrorist
act planned and paid for by Norwegians, such as the Shalhevet Pass case well
may be, and one do not take steps to make that publicly known, then one inevitably
comes to support the buildup of that nazi-reminiscent "terror-and-monkeybiz"
system which spreads like a disease and which forces people to blame their neighbours
for the terror and thereby create new effects which it subsequently is difficult
to heal. That is why it is important to stop the Norwegian state terrorism.
I think the norsies go to their office in the morning, well-combed, well-dressed,
and sit down with the paper to make a new crossword assassination list for supporting
their political advances. It is the same mystery as the nazis, and the reason
is that this is a matter of monkeybusiness: It is not their ideas, and therefore
they do not feel responsible. This has lasted since 1997 and it is extremely
important that this 'mystery' be not allowed to develop any further. It is the
same as with the nazis: They should have been stopped at a much earlier stage.
But it was difficult to reveal the nazis as monkeybizers on the Kurdish project.
It is, though, much easier to reveal the norsies as monkeybizers on my project
- which should be done. The Norwegians are using indexation of my work for making
their background, including the terrorism. Assume that Norwegians are behind
the two-in-cave and 100-goats-theft which accompanied Jagland's arrival in Israel.
That is his name and my authorship (from '...to be an emperor...'). Then
if I send a letter protesting against this, the letter may appear to come from
the terrorists, when it comes from my authorship, and it is difficult to be
understood the right way.
Then of course there is something profoundly wrong.
This is what has been wrong since 1997: The wrongway development started with
the monkeybusiness pirating of my application for project support and of my
PhD, and it has developed into enormous proportions. It is extremely important
that this big lie be exposed publicly as a lie.
Kissufim fence bomb
There were two Romanian workers repairing a border fence at Kissufim when a
bomb went off at noon the same day as the two youths were found, I notice that
the name 'Jens Erik Fenstad' means 'will not see fence-take [or 'fence-stand']
again'. Jens Erik Fenstad
was in the committee which rejected my PhD dissertation for dirty business purposes,
for the Norwegian monkeybusiness project. It was that 'education loan' which
was used to support the US embassy bombings, that which also was used for the
Norwegian government's website front page yesterday. From the report in Jerusalem
Post, it seems as if the bomb could have targeted the workers as Romanian per
se, in which case the purpose could have been to target the nationality of Corina
Belcea from my book "Cardiff/Harding", a title which has been used
so extensively by Norwegian monkey-bizers, not the least during the Easter terror
recently, for Statoil. Telenor has also used Belcea for marketing itself, such
as in the five-six fullpage ads in the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten in the
days right before and after the millenium shift (my name and one on Belcea and
some other things). The title "Cardiff/Harding" is probably also the
undertext for the Norwegian Youth Labour Party's campaign on their website (www.auf.no)
for throwing Israel out of the Eurovision Song Contest. That also seems to represent
the title "Cardiff/Harding" - for Young Labour, that is true, but
that is also the Labour Party. Hence the Kissufim fence bomb may be another
'support' for Jagland's visit by way of this website and the general tendency
for the Monkeybiz Project to make use of the title. This comes in addition to
the two youths in the cave and the 100 stolen goats, which represent Jagland's
name and my authorship - just like the AUF website represents my authorship
by the title "Cardiff/Harding", and supported by the Labour government's
official website front page (on www.odin.dep.no). Then Jagland's 'peace' visit
serves to spread dread and terror for the purpose of selling more Norwegian
Statoil and Telenor.
A claim of responsibility for this Kissufim fence bomb was faxed to Reuters,
allegedly from Hamas (but the fax could of course have come from anywhere).
The same obtained for the assassination of Stephen Saunders in Athens, which
was 'announced' in a telephone to me around the time when it happened (seemingly
from Statoil), and for which a wellknown terrorist group in Athens claimed responsibility
in a letter to a newspaper.
Conclusion
I think it is wise to go through the series of bombs and assassinations that
has taken place in Israel at least since September last year, and before that
as well, to look for possible Norwegian initiatives. For example, the Tulkarem
victims seemed to be clear cases. A car bomb in Herzl Street in Netanya did
so as well. I think there are many of those. The Israel-Palestine situation
represents global signification, and that is probably why the norsies may have
been involved in terror in that area: A small act has a large effect in the
global consciousness. That may also be the reason why Israel and Palestine always
are in the news.
Jagland's visit was probably correlated also with the bombing of the Aceh dormitory
in Jakarta and the parcel bomb in Depok, possibly for "The Book" or
"Depot" (library?), on the same day. See also the following case,
with parcel bomb and land mine.
The Monkeybiz Project must be stopped and fully exposed in the media. And I
must get project support for my project: That is in fact the essence of the
whole thing, since the Monkeybiz Project builds on giving the salary to the
wrong man and to pirate my project instead of supporting it. The Monkeybiz Project
is all about doing the wrong thing. It should not be allowed to continue.
Has anybody asked who Stoltenberg is prime minister instead of?
Parcel bomb in Madrid and a land mine on Sri Lanka
On 14 May, Clinton came to Oslo to give a lecture in Oslo Concert Hall on 'leadership
and communication' and to have talk with current prime minister Stoltenberg
(under Kursk and Hebei etc.) and Bondevik, prime minister during the US and
Chinese embassy bombs. Tickets were sold out in spite of the high price of 1000
dollars to hear the lecture Clinton had written on the airplane (as he told
to a journalist). The day after, on 15 May, an article in Nettavisen http://www.nettavisen.no/servlets/page?section=2&item=156417
showed a picture of a Chinese-looking Clinton arriving to talks with Stoltenberg,
and a PR-man called Hans Geelmuyden was interviewed about Stoltenberg's appearance
during the visit. He characterized him in by a rather queer selection of words
which obviously was intended to mean something else. He says he appeared as
a "slightly flatfoot assistant teacher for an 'obs'-class". This collection
of 'mots justes' sounds in the original as 'litt plattfot lÊrervikar for
en obs-klasse', and rewrites with some spoonerisms to 'Windows platform Ronk
Røver for a clubs-asse'. I take the Windows platform to be Microsoft's
Windows XP, where I recognize the XP from my diary mention of how the word 'explanation'
by some non-standard word-processor behavior decomposed into e-xp-lanation and
and intruded into a car number to give "BC 7466lanation 6", for Ulla
Birgitte Heggelund whose name also was used for indexing the Hebei bombs. 'Teacher
assistant' is trivially Ronk Røver, while the Clubs-asse must refer to
the nightclub owner who was car-bombed in Voula a few days earlier, with Norwegian
correlates in Dag Vaula and new union leader Gerd-Liv Valla who here probably
represents Ulla Heggelund. Hence the Chinese-looking Clinton had met another
Chinese-looking man, so to speak. There was also the Chinese embassy bombs,
while Per Bøthun was leader for the Norwegian contingent to Kosovo and
Bondevik was prime minister.
Now the name of the PR-man who ventured these characteristics was Hans Geelmuyden,
a name similar to Han Skjel¯yde which means 'the man with the squinteye'.
But that was Clinton, the middle man, on the picture, when he arrived to meet
the prime minister on Chinese-looking matters. When the bombing of the nightclub
owner in Voula seems to be connected with Koch Christensen in Bergen due to
the significational role of the librarian there, and Norwegian for 'middle man'
is 'mellommann', there is an obvious reference to my text from "Birds to
Saladin" on 'poetry' and 'Feldman', if Feldman is Marty Feldman which rewrites
by the same sort of spoonerisms into Farty Mellommann - farty middleman. Here
is the text in the framework it has in my book on page 242:
Exodus 16.25: "You will not find any of it
on the ground today".
You come across label in the hands
and orthodox must necessarily out her hands.
Same kind of set: You must lover, You must love her?
and the jitterbuh I have already examined.
Supposed to be fishin' centrepole,
the handsome victim
so free from poetry there. Poetry is:
Throughout the Feldman
winnowing its fortune,
the rugby hall is overwhelmed,
with joy importuned.
A little bit of over-helmed
jitterbag or lost the speech control:
We are the furry bear around,
the fox unleashed, the bird o'ertuned.
And how much are we shamed,
how out of role,
as from a fortunate collector?
Speed up the wheel, the old
paraphrase of things unbound,
and let life to your soul.
Peter Cocked,
procent cockerel
In this sonnet, with explicit mention of Feldman, there are also some wellknown
names from Norwegian politics in the undertext. Thorbjørn Jagland is
in the bear, fox and rural bird, Kjell-Magne Bondevik can be recognized in the
overhelmed jitterbag. Spoonerisms on the Norwegian government produces wellsounding
heroic forms, while spoonerism on 'Marty Feldman' does not. So maybe the norses
did not like to pay so much.
'Far til mellommann' is an equally likely reading here, meaning 'father of the
middle man'. Clinton is father of Chelsea Clinton, whose name comes out like
Cilsea Chenton or something like that. The article was posted on the web at
12:09, while a parcel bomb (http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/05/15/spain.blast/index.html)
exploded at 10:20, less than two hours before, in Madrid, at the journalist
Gorka L...., who got wounded but survived. The name rewrites by spoonerism to
my name. The bomb was hidden in a book which I suppose was meant to represent
a poetry book. The posting of the article and the parcel bomb seem related,
but they are so close in time that the article could not be made on background
of the news of the bomb. I concluded that the parcel bomb was made to support
the spoonerisms sending Clinton back to the USA with the blame for the Chinese
bombs which also was signified by Ulla Heggelund (as Gerd-Liv Valla) and Windows
platform.
In fact the article made me infer that some Norwegian terrorism on a similar
derivation of the name Kofi Annan would come up, and I guessed that it would
be in the form of Ofi Kanaan. I wrote this to US State Department on 16 May.
The terrorism took place not on Ofi Kannan for Israel Kanaan but spooneristic
in a Sri Lankan area. The next morning, there were the news on CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/south/05/16/slanka.blast
.talks/index.html) that the political leader Thamil Chelvan (cp. also 'Chelsea
Clinton') of the Tamil Tigers had been surprised, while on the way to a meeting
with the Norwegian government's peace envoy to the Sri Lanka (Erik Solheim),
by a land mine which exploded under his security guard's Mitsubishi Pajero car
at Kokkavil. See also www.tamilnet.com. Chelvan
escaped unhurt but an LTTE trooper lost his life and another two were injured.
Here is the Monkeybusiness on Pajero
Kokkavil for "Peter Cocked, procent cockerel". The news had appeared
already early 16 May on TamilNet website but had appeared on CNN only on 17
May. I suppose the accident happened on 15 May, around the same time as the
parcel bomb and the article. The convoy was on the way to a meeting with the
Norwegian government's peace envoy, the middle man Erik Solheim, who
here necessarily has to appear as 'farty' if the Norwegian government was behind
the land mine in the LTTE-controlled area. The representative from the Norwegian
FM is called Ms. Kjersti Tromsdal, with interesting allusions to my "Endmorgan
Quartet" and the name of another Norwegian author (KjÊrstad). A day
or two after, a socalled claymore blast took place in Thoatteveli, probably
for 'toalettpapir' representing the Volkswagen Beetle exploding in Medellin
in Parque Lleras (see below), something which calls for the interpretation 'ler-ras'
= 'clayslide' or 'mudslide' for Parque Lleras and the 'claymore blast', supporting
the 'loopaper + bit-reversal' for Madonna apparitions. The 'claimer' is probably
the same as has made territorial claims in Antarctica, as the locus of
apparition technology. The Tamil Guardian had its front page smeared by hackers
with the message F*** USA (instead of Ronk Kusa), and a data virus appeared
mainly in Europe with a clear reference to this Tamil district and the Monkeybiz
Project, all in the course of these two-three days.
The land mine and the parcel bomb in Madrid thoroughly establishes the spoonerism
on the Norwegian government and other indexes, and I suppose it is intended
for use in Norwegian politics. I had in fact, some days earlier, expected that
some terrorism could happen with Tamils due to the role of my niece's name 'Camilla
Aukrust', being similar to 'Kabila Laurent'. Her birthdate is 12 August, same
as the Kursk accident, something which turns her name into Tamila AuKursk, or
"Tamil of Kursk" or something like that. I suppose the norses have
terrorism to represent that rewrite, since it represents both Kursk, Hebei and
Kabila and therefore is a precious rewrite for the terrorist norsies. The periodical
'Camilla' has got a separate entry on the government's website.
Erik Solheim's name reads Erik's Old-Home which should mean Erik's Retire Home.
There is a retire home on the left side of Telenor's address in Heggebakken
2 in Bergen, and on the right-hand side there is Erik Berstad's house in King
Oscar's Street where I lived while I wrote "Birds to Saladin" before
I fled to Vilnius. Telenor's is in the mid point - the 'mid point phenomenon',
as I am sure the norsies would say. Erik Berstad's address, Telenor and the
rest of the environment there was addressed in the Christmas terror, with terrorism
distributed over the globe.
Is that the reason why the Norwegian government wanted to send a peace envoy
with the name Erik Solheim (to the area where Jon Westborg is ambassador)? I
suppose so, since that allowed them to be met with confidence which they could
bomb facefartingly in order to install their name puzzles in the global consciousness,
in the same manner as the Tekoa victims in Israel. There are Norwegian representatives
in Sri Lanka, the Middle East and Colombia, apparently peace envoys but probably
rather enhancing the conflicts by terror for divide-and-conquer to promote the
Monkeybiz Project.
The LTTE initially blamed a 'deep penetration team' from the Sri Lankan army
for the blast. Thamil Chelvan's convoy has previously been attacked by such
a 'deep penetration team', so maybe the norsies have been active before, in
order to make politics on the name-similarity of Thamil Chelvan and Chelsea
Clinton and do commercials for Telenor and Heggebakken (cp. Heggelund and the
Hebei bombs) by the farty middleman role of Erik Solheim. This, again, is probably
typical of the "terror-and-monkeybiz" policy of Norway today.
Bomb in Medellin, blast in Londonderry
On 17 May in the evening, there was also a disastrous bomb blast in Parque Lleras
in Medellin in Colombia, leaving 7 dead and many injured, in the evening at
10:15, which is 0315 GMT. The bomb was in a Volkswagen
Beetle. The time "quarter past three" (GMT) suggests my name,
when "kÂt" (as in 'quart') means "horny". The Volkswagen
Beetle is probably from my book "A deep ratch" page 115, where I mention
"a white Volkswagen bubble with dazzling lights seen in the distance"
(the Beetle is called a Bubble in Norwegian). Medellin is probably from my Pilot
Study 1999, called "Mandelson and the Poet Laureate" from January
1999. It ends with three important examples of 'nature poetry' quotes from my
books: 1) The Beachy Head landslide near Brighton, the tall white Dover cliff
falling down and crossing the sea out to the lighthouse, represented as the
rooster's crow, the turning point in my Endmorgan Quartet in parallel with the
verse from Luke where the rooster crows after Peter's third denial, as follows
in my text: "As mirror mixes time and frequency / in a mo-memorable cap,
/ the problem is: How can 'far' people get out at sea? / I went out to the time
and sea / in Brighton Rock, but I couldn't find no secret". I wrote this
before the landslide was reported on 12 January 1999 in The Times. It is probably
this landslide from my text which occurs in New Labour's campaign song "Lifted
by the lighthouse family". 2) The large earthquake in Medellin some weeks
after the landslide. 3) The Kurdish girl Nejla Kanteper who put fire to herself
outside the Greek embassy in London after the arrest of Ocalan. 'Parque Lleras
in Medellin' (where the bomb was) probably means just 'earthquake in
Medellin', and refers to my authorship.
The Beachy Head took place on the day when Poet Laureate Ted Hughes posthumously
was awarded the T.S.Eliot prize for his "Birthday Letters". The Medellin
earthquake happened on the day when he also was awarded the Whitbread Book of
the Year Prize for the same book. The two events are related also as such to
the Poet Laureate (who had an important role in my Pilot Study) and to my authorship.
And there was the impressive reference to Madeleine Albright in Medellin + Brighton.
Hence if the bomb in Medellin referred to the "Poet Laureate" part
of the title, the "Mandelson" part of it was probably represented
in the explosion at a military security force base in Londonderry in the morning
after, on 18 May. 'Military security force base' is a representation of the
names Siri Meyer and Siv-Ellen Kraft ('kraft' means 'force') abbreviated SEK.
Londonderry means my name John Bjarne Grover, and hence is linked to the time
point 0315 GMT for the Medellin bomb. Mandelson's resignation in Christmas 1998
is an essential part of the story in "Mandelson and the Poet Laureate",
and he returned to the government as Northern Ireland secretary, where he remained
untill he resigned again - and was replaced by John Reid - after I had applied
for political asylum (or something like that) in England. In the resignation
in Christmas 1999, there was also the element of the free flight with the lingerie
billionaire Linda Wachler (I think was the name) which I had now just mentioned
in my analysis of the Omagh bomb a couple of days before this Londonderry blast.
I had also just sent a letter to New Labour and suggested that they send me
some money when they use my ideas in their election campaign.
One of the young Tekoa cave victims in Israel, on Jagland's arrival, was son
of Mandell, or simply Mandelson, again for representing my authorship. The
other was Yosif Ish-Ran, probably for Jagland.
In short, a reference to my authorship by Mandelson and the Poet Laureate. I
guess that Medellin and Londonderry were correlated in order to make for the
reference to the New Labour election campaign. In the morning 18 May, there
were also two incidents outside my window: A car stopped in the street and let
the engine run for five minutes while the driver looked at the weather before
it drove away, and a man arrived and fumbled with some strange device which
I think was an hydraulic jack under my window before he stuffed it in a plastic
bag and hurried away. I reported these to Lithuanian FM before the news of the
Londonderry blast and before I had read about the Medellin bomb. The first represents
my father's birthname John Jensen (engine sounds), the second probably the name
Ulla Heggelund (hydraulic jack). My father had a white Volkswagen Beetle, representing
'loopaper bitreversal'. When the two events also very precisely represented
the two 'attempts' against the Pausts in the summer 1998, they also refer to
the Paust Case or 'postkasse' for 'mailbox'. My Yahoo mailbox exhibited strange
behavior that day, allowing for two former letters to Gerd-Liv Valla (cp. Ulla
Heggelund) to pop up again unreadable in the Inbox. The following night, there
were new wild engine sounds sounding like a dirty beast up the street and two
taxis stopped outside my window and the drivers chatted loudly in the darkness
for five minutes.
Parque Lleras is probably also related to Parkveien where Clinton met Stoltenberg.
So what do you think - is this Clinton and Blair commenting on my studies, or
is it Norwegian state terrorism? I think it is Norwegian state terrorism. It
is in any case the Monkeybiz Project terrorism, I conclude.
Car bomb in Madrid; Klara Mandic in Belgrade
I add mention of another two terrorist acts (among very many other scattered
cases that could be discussed as possible candidates for being labelled 'Norwegian
state terrorism') which are linked to the monkeybiz project. These two presented
themselves in the news as if to suggest that the terrorists have certain contacts
of some importancy:
1. The car bomb in Goya Street in Madrid at midnight last night. (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/05/11/spain.bomb.02.reut/index.html).
Goya refers to my diary by Zoja written as Soya with Russian 's' character 'C'
and with a little tag on it for voicing, making it a 'G'. That is a story (including
details on the phonology) from my diary which the monkeybizers may have linked
to 31 January (30777 days after my father's birth) - and perhaps the Spanish
film on Goya may have been related to it. The story appears in my diary on the
same date as the story of XP and the strange word processor on my computer which
converted 'explanation' into an e- plus a lost XP and the car number "BC
7466lanation 6", that story which I recognized in Bill Gates' new Windows
XP which was introduced along with the shooting of nine wolves ('ulv') in Norway.
It probably represent 'Ulla Birgitte Heggelund' (same name as indexed in the
Hebei bombs) and my authorship. That also reads from the origin in Soya to Soya
Gtreet, for 'SÂ jaktr IT'. Why midnight, before the Basque election? Maybe
in order to imitate my assertion that the norse monkeybizers intrude into fields
of political tension with terror for spreading it over the globe. 'Ulv-labb
i gitteret?' Or to the story of Z in my diary? It happened outside Banco Bilbao
Vizcaya Argentaria, if that means anything.
2. Klara Mandic, a Milosevic ally, was found beaten to death in her home in
Belgrade. See http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/05/11/Milosevic.ally/index.html.
The story is very similar to the story of Knut Kristiansen in Oslo and the rewrite
of the event to 'kiste-i K.Kristiansen' (which may have motivated the recent
car bomb in Voula relating to Dag Vaula and Gerd-Liv Valla, putting Kirsti Koch
Christensen in a certain relationship to Valla), which here produces 'kiste-i
K.Mandic'. The 'attempted robbery' and the partial burning of her flat suggests
that this is supposed to be a case of Ronk R¯ver and hence probably supposed
to read 'Kirsti Commander'. Does it refer to the Easter terror, or does it relate
Kirsti Koch Christensen to the bombing of the Chinese embassy - and even to
the assassination of Anne Orderud Paust? I notice that 'coffin K.Mandic' is
close to 'supreme commander'. And NATO supreme commander Wesley Clark was 'fired'
by personnel rotation in the end of his term after I had complained on the wrongway
bombings in the Kosovo war in a letter to Madeleine Allbright. The story may
suggest that Kirsti Koch Christensen, as rector for the University of Bergen
where the SEK and Siri Meyer are, served as temporary supreme commander for
NATO when the decision on the bombing of the Chinese embassy was taken. The
bombing served to represent 'Siri Meyer' at SEK by 'Seven May' and 'Beijing'
(while SEK was represented via 'Siv-Ellen Kraft' by the bombing of the US embassies
in Kenya and Tanzania on 'Seventh of August' 1998). Then it is the University
of Bergen which sits on top of the Chinese embassy bombing on 7 May 1999. It
is not the best university in the world today.
The Norwegian Parliament is responsible for ensuring that the terrorist Monkeybiz
Project be brought to an end. There are terrorist acts relating to this Norwegian
Monkeybiz Project almost every day, and the madness must be stopped.
The whole thing is about money to me instead of more terrorism. It is urgent.
The reason for all this
A small group of Norwegian soldiers were - according to a Norwegian newspaper,
if that is reliable, and I suppose it is not - the first to enter Pristina at
the end of the Kosovo 'air campaign', even if Norway had not participated in
the flights over the conflict regions. Why? Probably because it had to do with
me and my project, in some way or other. (I faxed a letter to Madeleine Albright
wherein I complained on certain aspects of the norse monkeybusiness in the Kosovo
conflict, and, in the evening the same day, supreme commander Wesley Clark was
fired, with some personell rotation in the end of his term. He sighed to the
press: "For a soldier, when it's over, then it's over"). The reason
for the embassy terror, and for an enormous amount of other subsequent terrorist
acts relating to this monkeybiz project attempting to pirate my poetic science
project, is that I had to move back from London to Bergen in Norway in June
1998. That is when everything turned around and the rest of the world mistook
the norses for me not the least due to the monkeybiz project which had been
started already in 1997. While I had worked with this project for a long time,
systematically for at least ten years, the norses suddenly plunged into it,
dressed up in it and presented themselves to the rest of the world as if it
were their project. All over the world, people were prepared for participating
in the millenium project on global signification in the new computer era, a
project which in fact was the one I had made and applied for and which was pirated
by the research council. (The concept of global signification is mine). Therefore
everybody greeted the monkeybizers with enthusiasm and were interested in collaborating
with them, even if the real concerns of the norses now turned out to be not
global signification but monkeybusiness. Could it be more ridiculous?
What a joke! In the mean time, I was stranded in Bergen and could not get out
of the country due to lack of money. That state soup was the reason for the
whole series of tragedies. The list of bombings, assassinations, massacres,
tragedies of all sorts under the flag of the Monkeybiz Project is unfortunately
very long.
The norsies and the nazis
I have analyzed the nazis as a result of the rejected application for a state
by the Kurds after the first world war. The Kurds represent, in my analysis,
the cultural continuity of the cuneiform knowledge throughout the alphabetic
period - and the Kurds may well have been the Sumerians. Just like the Jews
were wandering statelessly around after Christ who - in my analysis - represents
the introduction of a morphemic arbitrarity in signification, the Kurds have
been without political independence throughout the 3500 years of the alphabetic
period, after the alphabet was invented by the Jews. In 1923, the Kurds were
finally in the position to regain their political independence for the historic
turn by new computer era which is about to take over after the alphabetic period,
but their application was rejected. The massive historic impulse which had accumulated
through these 3500 years and waited for being released, was rejected and was
instead pirated by the dreadful nazis who turned their project into the most
bizarre parody on the new knowledge which the world has seen. It started with
the Beer Hall Putsch exactly three and a half month after the Kurdish
application had been rejected in Lausanne. On basis of a somewhat vague philosophical
ancestry in the Middle East, the nazis stood up for the Kurdish project and
expressed their disappointment, and they took up the persecution of the Jews
who had invented the alphabet which had been the 'reason' for the loss of Kurdish
independence so long ago. They pirated the project of the new millenium and
the new computer episteme such as this will come to be a return to the cuneiform
basis of knowledge, and they felt that they were right. They really were right,
they said to themselves in the Bierstub, and millions followed the monkeybizers.
Hitler suffered a lot and wrote 'Mein Kampf' in Landsberg prison after the putsch.
They were monkeybizers and did not know it, but they felt that the project was
right: Indeed the basis for the Kurdish project was right, but they had pirated
it in the global domain and did not know about it.
The story is similar to the story of the Monkeybiz Project which was based on
the pirating of my application in "A pilot study for a poetic science"
to the Norwegian research council in June 1997 (rejected by committee led by
Tarald Taraldsen in October), and
on my PhD dissertation from December 1997. The project application was supposed
to be a millenium project on the new knowledge in the global domain, a project
which I have carried out under difficult working conditions. Many people have
followed the monkeybizers - who also stood up for me and expressed my disappointment
by the rejected application and PhD with terror all over the world - because
the project (which had been pirated) was right. They had waited for
the millenium project on the new global knowledge and joined it with enthusiasm
when it arrived. But they were cheated by pirates, as they now discover. It
is exactly like the nazis whose project was based on a rejected application.
The parody is that the new episteme, the knowledge of the computer era, is going
to be the end of the monkeybusiness which has been at the heart of the alphabetic
period. The alphabet is monkeybusiness, the computer is not. Hence my project
was pirated by those interesters who felt threatened by the new knowledge, pirated
by even such destructive means as the US embassy bombs, and they tried to turn
it into what was. The new millenium is integritist, while the former millenium
was monkeybiz. That seems to be a new (and probably temporary) political division
line which runs across the traditional left and right party lines.
The parallel to the nazis is not farfetched. It is justified even when it comes
to the characteristic use of violence. The violence which has followed the Monkeybiz
Project has been rather massive, and a future count will probably find out how
many thousands have been left dead after the project. How many massacres in
Kashmir, Algeria, Columbia, Burundi and other countries have they invested in?
Let's look for the positive: Even with all its destructiveness, the purpose
of the Monkeybiz Project was perhaps just to understand what nazism was about
and to find the solution for the new millenium which was lost in 1923 and thereabout.
That is perhaps why the immature norsies were in the forefront of the
Monkeybiz Project and based their gags on the rejection of my application.
Status of the project
Making up status at the end of the planned project period, I find that my work
has produced what perhaps is the biggest discovery ever made. It is this: My
project is on global signification, which is about the incorporation of diachrony
into the synchronic description. That is also about solving the profound epistemological
crisis which met the science theorists in the thirties. I have, through many
years of systematic work, developed a poetic muse who speaks internally in me
whever there is something interesting articulated in the global domain, and
I have, with this global poetic muse, written The Endmorgan Quartet which consists
in successive entries for each day (throughout one year in the 'temporal' book).
The US school shooting is a particular phenomenon which took place mainly during
the Bondevik period. The cases which there have afterwards, have also related
strongly to my work and authorship in that book. I discovered that if I compared
one school shooting case with another similar case and computed the temporal
mid point between these, the name of the shooter will be found, normally with
only minor rewrites, in the mid entry for the mid point date between the similar
events. This is empirically shown (the book is published to legal deposit libraries
and stored in the copyright register in Washington), which means that a new
empirical science is born which is based on poetic knowledge in the global domain.
This is the science of the third millenium for the computer episteme. This can
probably lead to the construction of an apparition technology which also
solves the problem of the finite upper limit for the speed of light by going
through eternity instead of the laborious trotting through history, and hence
an email can reach the other end of the galaxy in no time, while traditional
signal transmission will need thousands or millions of years. The new knowledge
which I have shown the empirical reality of is the knowledge which varies dependently
among humans scattered over the globe, among genetic subsets of humanity, and
the discovery shows that it is possible to establish a formal logic for this
domain. That is where the new computation will take place which vastly will
transcend the Turing boundary (as I also wrote in my application from 1997).
These are very great discoveries. And it is my preparatory work for these
discoveries which has been the basis for the monkeybiz project and for the
business interesters. Hence it is my work which also has been the basis for
all the fat profits that has been made in the framework of the Monkeybiz Project.
I have summed up the results of the project period as follows:
1. I have made what probably is the biggest discovery ever made
2. I have made the basis for the biggest culture project in the world today
(participants from everywhere: Democrats, Republicans, Madonna, Spice Girls,
CNN, Hollywood, etc etc. See www.artscouncil.org.uk
for 'Ronk Roever' the
norse, 'The Endmorgan Quartet' and 'John Bjarne Groever').
3. Norway and other countries have earned very large sums of money from my work
4. An extensive terror has developed from the monkeybiz project, with thousands
of
dead and tens of thousands crippled
I have concluded that the terror (in all sorts of countries, notably in Kashmir,
Indonesia, Algeria, Columbia, Spain and many other countries) is a direct result
of points 1-3, in the sense that the norses [or representatives] have credited
with terror instead of with money to me. I have asked them over and over
again for money to do my project which the whole world is profiting from and
which they themselves have earned so much money from, but they have so far ignored
my inquiries and rejected all my applications. It is totally absurd.
Money is needed
I have said it over and over again: There is only one solution to the absurdity,
and that is that I get enough money to get independent of the norses. As it
is now, if I run out of money, I risk being sent back to Norway since I have
only a Norwegian citizenship, and then I am in the state soup again. So I need
money. I have told the norses that they cannot ever find a more obvious case
to support with money. How good must the application be for being accepted?
Is it not enough that it is the biggest discovery ever made and that the project
is the biggest culture project in the world today? And what about all the millions
or billions of kroner (or dollars) the norses have earned from my work by advertising
with my name and fragments of my authorship and touring the world as representing
me - isn't that a good reason also? And all the thousands of dead and tens of
thousands of people all over the world crippled from terrorist acts relating
directly to the monkeybiz - isn't it a good reason to prevent that this continues?
Why wait another day?
So far, there has been only deep silence to be heard from that nordic country.
They listen to their own limitations and wonder what this is.
It is now about to become urgent that my project be financed - that I get money.
The norses put me in the madhouse and labelled me chronic paranoid in order
to prevent that people believe me when I tell others about the political and
business use of my name in their activities and the story of the pirating: "Serious
mental disorder, chronic paranoid psychosis" - that is how they label me
in Norwegian databases (at least medical databases) today. If you should doubt
my version of the story, listen through Madonna's record "Music"
or scan the last three years' front pages of the German magazine STERN
for my name, and your doubt is gone. But the norses will not admit any role
for me in this project. At least I have not heard anybody admit that yet, but
I would very much like to have a written confirmation from somebody that this
phenomenon of my name as undertext really has taken place, and then I will send
a copy of that to the madhouse and the ministry of justice and ask for deletion
of the diagnosis of paranoia (which was built exclusively on the concept of
'delusions about references to the patient in the media') and for economic compensation.
While I was locked up in the madhouse, the norses broke into my flat and stole
the files on my computer for further use in monkeybusiness, and they left a
menu on the screen for me, just to tell me that they had been there and stolen
everything I had written through many years. It may have been for the purpose
of having me 'in the cell' while pumping my authorship out of my computer to
give rise to lots of inspired projects? They rejected my PhD for the dirty business
in the monkeybusiness project with the US embassy bombings, a rejection which
seriously has destroyed my income possibilities. Add to this the facefarting
monkeybusiness, the terror and the large profits they have made from my work,
as well as the notable prosperity of the country in general, with a small fortune
per person per year pumped up as oil from the bottom of the North Sea, and you
haven't seen it more ridiculous. The real reason for their reluctancy to acknowledge
me is that they do not want to give up the project which they 'found' in my
Pilot Study application in 1997, and in particular when that 'finding' was magnified
with the bomb hysteria after the rejection of my PhD following my return to
Norway in June 1998 and possibly all the other terrorism. It is quite a fall
for the norses to give that up now by accepting that it is mine and not theirs,
and they feel perhaps somewhat ugly afterwards. But that is how it must be if
that is how it is and they cannot but fall deeper if they delay the turn even
more.
But unless the norses turn around soon, I must ask for support from elsewhere.
My money is running out. Since my letters are normally responded to only with
terror in the news, and my hundreds of applications in Norway through
the last years have been rejected, my chances are near null through the ordinary
channels. That is why I have to ask for economic help.
I suppose that is the essence of this story: The disasters and tragedies all
over the globe are because I have not received money for my creative project.
Even if the Pope's visit to the mosque at Saladin's tomb should imply a strong
support for my authorship, Stoltenberg's labour government will obviously not
support me with money for doing more of the same work. On the contrary, they
will launch a new campaign trying to steal historic support from my work by
means of state terrorism spreading dread and terror, and dress up in my authorship
to present it as their own while they suppress me. Can it possibly be lousier?
Then it is time to face the reality: That labour government is violent and reactionary.
It must be possible to do it better than this. Send me money today!
Conclusion on the monkeybiz project and state terrorism
The conclusion can be made that the labour parties are about to develop into
the most reactionary and violent political forces, and they are running the
risk of being the true interpretation of nazism if they carry on their pirating
policy. Do the norsies plan to send their foreign minister around with new cruelties
for representing my authorship under his name? It is easy to see how the new
authorship level can invite to such violent and reactionary state terrorist
politics, and it is also easy to see why it is the labour parties that are vulnerable
to such development. That is why integritism vs. monkeybizm may turn out to
be the new political division line - probably with centre left as the monkeybizers
and centre right as the integritists, left/right merging into monkeybizers (reactionaries)
vs. integritists (progressives). And with the progressive integritists merging
with the marxists on the paradisial utopia of the stateless and classless society
which now can be reached without the intermediate proletariat dictatorship which
formerly made communism such a drag. Then the labour parties are left with a
pale interpretation of the dictatorship of the proletariat only, as a historical
residue which has lost its meaning and therefore develops into a violent reaction
of a sort of national socialism.
Tony Blair's Labour is now (May 2001) running an election campaign much based
on elements borrowed from my authorship, but so far without acknowledging me
and without paying money to me for it. Will Tony Blair's Labour send money
to my bank account to support my project? That is the essential question
the answer to which puts the party into either the monkeybiz or the integritist
category. Or he can make someone else donate money to my project. After all,
I have made some really big discoveries including the one showing that the foot-and-mouth
which broke out well in time for the election campaign conformed to the telling
of the monkeybiz story in terms of place names, from the beginning of it, with
the application and all. Isn't that a big discovery! It can lead to the solution
of AIDS and other diseases, and it certainly does call for economic support
when it comes in addition to the other discoveries I have made in the project.
Tony Blair's Labour should be the first to help me with financial support from
either themselves or from other sources who can support my project. Why hasn't
that happened yet? I have concluded that either is my discovery worthy of support
for my project because it can rescue a lot of people and values, or it is not
considered smart to support it because the foot-and-mouth is a matter of eco-terrorism
and it is hazardous to support the project: It would then suggest that infectious
material has been planted in the environment to spread the disease in such a
way that the epidemic tells the story of the Monkeybiz Project by the placenames
of the farms and districts where the livestock had to be slaughtered. What a
campaigning that would be! It would be left for Labour only to do jokes and
gags while Nature does the rest for them before the election, leading to burning
animals and all that. It would mean that a mythological Monkeybiz Project cracks
down on the humans like a stern divinity to adjust their course towards Monkeybiz
- as a reminder before the election. It would be a way of modelling divine status
to the monkeybizers, just like the terrorists have been using Madonna signification
(for example the Volkswagen Beetle in Parque Lleras in Medellin) in order to
make the terrorism look like impressive and aweful expressions from the divine.
It is then all too easy to conclude that the disease could have been planted
in the animals by New Labour or their cointeresters in order to win the election.
It would be easy to do and difficult to discover. What a pity that would be.
Hence when I call for economic support to my project, including the study of
the mytho-logi-cal and narrative basis for the spread of epidemics such as AIDS
and foot-and-mouth, New Labour should rush to the nearest donor to convince
them that money should be sent to me as fast as possible. Why? Because my project
can save a lot of people and values and lead to real progress for mankind, and
monkeybizers should not rule a country. I conclude that there are all good reasons
for New Labour to find somebody who can support my project with money now -
preferably before the election, while their election campaign is full of elements
from my authorship.
The question as to whether a state should be labelled a terrorist state boils
down to the question of crediting of the source. It is right to call Norway
a terrorist state if it is monkeybiz and uses the monkeybiz indexation in international
terrorist acts to represent itself and support its policy - never mind if they
have ordered the terrorism themselves or not. Does that mean that a political
party can be forced to leave a certain political representation of itself if
e.g. its political opponents carry out terrorism which is indexing that political
representation? Of course not: It is all about crediting the source. A political
party (or, say, any text) who credits its sources and acknowledges the real
source of its representation (an integritist party, that will be) is not threatened
by terrorism indexing that representation. That threat appears only when the
source is concealed. Hence state terrorism on the authorship level and monkeybusiness
on the real source of representation is one and the same thing - and that is
what nazism was about. The monkeybiz which looks Labour is the residual transformation
of the dictatorship of the proletariat after the new technology has made it
possible to reach the stateless and classless society without that intermediate
totalitarianism.
The conclusion to this study must be that the Monkeybiz Project has tried to
integrate into my authorship and tried to pirate it by means of terror. Then
when I write a letter in order to get help to get out of that, the letter is
a part of my authorship and hence it appears as coming from the terrorists.
No wonder people do not answer! The Monkeybiz Project with its integration policy
is behind all the major cases of terrorism in the last three-four years and
does not appear as much tempting.
The monkeybiz politics is wrong and it is based on lies and cheating and terror.
There is only one way out of this failure, and that is the following:
1. People must start supporting me - with money and acknowledgement, that is
2. People must start boycotting the terrorist monkeybizers - such as the Norwegian
state
This can bring the authorship back to me from the liers and cheaters and terrorists.
There is a very notable turn going on these days, with people voting integritist
instead of labour. I sent a version of this paper to Kofi Annan at UN and said
that it was urgent with money to me in order to see an end to the terrorist
monkeybiz project (suggesting that e.g. Unesco could finance my project), and
already the next day he was interviewed by BBC and said that the world's poorest
people do not want charity - they rather want to reach the international market,
as BBC summed him up. I don't know if he had read this paper. The conclusion
is probably anyhow that UN ought to be the right place to counterbalance the
sickening monkeybiz project, by financing its victims' projects and also by
informing about the real terrorist states in such a form that other countries
can relate to them in an appropriate way. But that requires that a thorough
critique be made of the monkeybusiness and its terrorist policy.
John Grover
PO Box 2943
2000 Vilnius
Lithuania
Email: johgrov@yahoo.com
Bank accounts: 070.48348 Vilniaus Bankas, Gedimino Pr.12, Vilnius, Lithuania
(SWIFT CBVI LT 2X)
(or 6094.15.61716 in Kreditkassen, Norway may perhaps also be possible)
The first proof:
John Grover: From the diaries 1994-1995
- The Dirty Beast in The Revelation -
Here is the excerpt from my diary which counts as a proof that
this is my project and that it has to do with the formalization of historical
time for incorporation as diachrony into the synchronic description. As I wrote
it, I had no idea of any particular historic rooting of it, even if in fact
I make the comment that it had to be written in just this position in the diary.
The historical rooting is this: My mother was born on the day which is exactly
in the mid point between the first revelation of Madonna in Lourdes on 11 February
1958 and 12 August 2000, while the number of days from my father's birthday
to 12 October 2000 is 30666. The latter number is obviously The Dirty Beast
in the Revelation (Rev.13), where the Revelation is represented by the other
side of the Madonna appartion in Lourdes in 1858. Hence the Dirty Beast in the
Revelation is to be found between 12 August and 12 October 2000, representing
the genetic formation of my authorship. That will be 12 September. In my diary
six years before, on 12 September there is the entry given below. It
obviously represents making love, making the genetic foundation of my authorship.
It is somewhat long and stiff and it was put into the text on this date even
if it had been made earlier (something which is unique for this entry). Here
are the elements of bit-reversals and nesting loops which provide for the basics
of the innate endowment of cognition in making the embryo, and how this embryo
attains individuality by the developing schizophreniform state of the mother
with a syntactic competence on the level below the morphemic. It is a little
remarkable to find it six years later when I opened the diary to find what I
had written on that day. I had then just discovered the Dirty Beast in the Revelation
after I had pondered the meaning of the sinking of the Russian submarine Kursk
in the Barents Sea on 12 August and the bombing of the US destroyer Cole in
Aden on 12 October, both of them political enigmas unless they were viewed in
the framework of a more or less cosmic drama, staged in order to represent just
that Dirty Beast (a sort of 'Auerochs') in the Revelation, and meaningful in
the framework of the project which this entry is written into. This is why I
looked it up - and found precisely this, with an interpretation in 1858 and
in the Revelation of John. I took this text from six years before as
evidence that the Dirty Beast in the Revelation had reality here in my life
as part of my poetic semiotic project. The text is about that cosmic union of
the sexes which creates a new universe - the genetic formation of my authorship.
Which, though, is not about the formation of my ideas, which belong to my diachrony
and are my own.
12 September 1994
I lay awake a little with a feeling that I should not have written last night's
notes. Now however I must add the following: I put in again the paragraph containing
the word 'Kabell‰nge' (and 'Kabbala') which had been inserted in the note
made on the 10th of September (but actually written some two weeks ago). As
I see last night's voice, I can now make an interpretation of the German form
'Kaffee', that is, KA-FE. The 'Fee', the 'Schicksalsgˆttin' or fate goddess
must have been my mother, who appeared on the 7th of September. It is she who
brought the KA. Why? This gets a little personal, but it will have to do. My
mother intrudes into my 'morphemes' (symbols) in order to prevent me from generating
my own reality. This is why I cannot cope with her. She wants to keep me imprisoned
in her own featural signification (so that she generates the 'morphemic' reality
of the family), and therefore it is important for her to prevent my social attachment
outside the family. This is what KA denotes here, and it is brought by the FE.
Thus my mother has come to denote my social defeats throughout the years, and
it has often happened in recent years, when I am failing socially, that I have
heard her voice saying 'TYRE-FEKTING', which means 'bullfighting'. 'Tyr' is
Norwegian for 'ox', and 'fekting' means 'fencing'. The voice thus says 'bullfighting'
as a comment to my failed attempts at social attachment, probably with the ironic
implication that I am the bull, and she is the toreador.
This is present in the two utterances. They were pronounced simultaneously
in one single utterance. They can now be decomposed as follows:
KA BE L L EN(g) DE
KA BE TYR BRÿD RE NE DA(H) L
This analysis assumes that [l] and [r] count as indistinguishable liquids, which
we must assume that they normally do in the period of global perception of single
words. The [l] in the first form was pronounced long by the voice, as it is
in the Norwegian pronounciation of this form. It is, in any case, written with
a double 'L'. Hence if this analysis is maintained, it appears that the last
'L' in the second form has been moved from the middle of the word onto the end,
just as happened with the digits in the car registration numbers (18666 and
86661) and in my friend's salary joke. In fact, this liquid is squeezed
out of this position by the intruding forms 'TYR BRÿD', which means 'ox
bread'. The bread is clearly present also in my friend's allusion to salary,
and in the purpose behind my searching for the calligraphic pen, to earn some
money. Copying orchestral parts is a most horrible activity I have taken to
from time to time throughout the years, just in order to earn some money. When
I now do it again, it is sheer need which forces me to do it. This is, then,
a sort of bullfighting, where I am the poor bull.
All this is of course very ridiculous, and this aspect of it explains the name
Skretteberg which
entered my mind repeatedly yesterday. Since 'A' could be substituted for 'E'
in the two forms (DE and DAH), the same can be done here, to give Skratteberg.
'Skratt' means 'laughing', a sort of ridiculing social expulsion. So, yesterday,
when I woke up, 'heart mountain' had been transformed into 'guffaw mountain',
with, I assume, the underlying implication that I am being laughed out of society.
These notes now steer into the purest nonsense. Why? Because they are no longer
transpersonal, but mark the point where the featural signification is left behind
and the capacity for naming occurs. This creates my personal signification,
which then no longer is universal.
Or is this all? There is another element here: There is intrusion into the morpheme.
Is this what creates the social ridiculing?
One hour later: Since I cannot start working without the pen, I decided
to go out to call Harald
Dahl and ask there (today is Monday, so the shop would be open). As I left
the house, I was immediately encountered by a car with registration number CC
99998. I thought: "This is incredible. It is the number next to the one
which I saw on the haunted spot in the summer, the one which 'announced' SJ,
whom I met just afterwards!". Even the letter combination is the same,
so the two car owners may well have been in the same queue waiting for registration.
Since SJ at that time performed the function of serving as a reference for me,
and I later interchanged him with professor Dahl, this number CC 99998 evidently
pointed to Dahl, whom I had written about last night. This alerted me as to
the 'haunted spot' where I had seen the number CC 99999, and I expected to find
something significant there as I approached it. Indeed I did find something:
On the sidewalk by the haunted spot, a car was parked with number DD 88777!
This is true! The driver of the car was standing by the large information board
for the student town which is put up there. My curiosity now forced me to go
and see what he was doing there, and I noticed that he had loosened one of the
signs on the board, on which it was written 'Ulf Thorshaugs plass'. It was fluttering
in the air, attached on only one side. I went down and made the phone call.
Dahl did not have the pen, but they could order it for me if I wanted. As I
came back up again, I saw that the sign with 'Ulf Thorshaugs plass' had been
removed from the table, and the man was pushing the other signs upwards to fill
in the empty slot where the removed one had been. I thought: "He is changing
the signs".
The name Ulf Thorshaug tells me nothing, but the fact that it pointed to a 'plass'
(that is, a spot, lot, place or square) gives the impression that the haunted
spot was now being removed. This is also what the registration number tells
me: It is the first occurrence of 777 I have seen there, after the long series
of 666 on exactly this place. And it was thoroughly announced by the number
CC 99998 which I met in the moment when I left the house to call the namesake
of Dahl.
As I approached the house, just below the place where the car with number CC
99998 had met me on my way upwards, there passed a car with number BC 56698.
Although this seems insignificant, I am now inspired to carry out a transformational
analysis, and move unity from 9 and forwards to add it to 5, to create the number
66688. This would make it significantly similar to the number 88777 which was
at the formerly haunted spot, and it would add to the impression that 8 is in
the process of gaining 'phonemic status' in this bizarre series of number occurrences.
In fact, it was precisely the transformational component which was present in
the performance at the information board, where the man pulled out one sign
and pushed the others upwards to fill in the empty slot. Maybe he even put the
first one in at the bottom after I had left.
This means, in any case, that I have now come to the onset of syntax.
The period of single words is finished, and the first two-word utterances can
occur. The word spurt also seems to have occurred with the massive density of
666- and 777-occurrences throughout the last weeks, and with the phonemic oppositions
in minimal pairs by the adjacent positions. The last days has also shown that
the number occurrences have been intimately connected significationally with
the street names, which, as a third point, suggests that there now has
occurred a new capacity for naming. Signification is no longer only a
matter of the subsymbolic digit occurrences and the obscure meanings inherent
in these, but it has attained a nature of a richer morphemic signification in
the names. In fact, the information board performance showed that a name
(Ulf Thorshaug) was taken out of a syntactic position, to be moved or deleted.
So, if today is the first instance of syntactic construction, represented in
the voice last night and in the information board rearrangement, this gives
the following development in the notes so far:
1. Submorphemic signification in numbers.
2. The word spurt with phonemic oppositions.
3. A new capacity for naming.
4. Onset of syntax (today).
This suggests that I have entered the morphemic reality, and left the featural,
represented by the haunted spot, behind.
However, even if the appearance of a syntactic component now seems to point
to a morphemic syntax (such as in the double utterance last night), the examples
which most strongly suggest this have been the transformation of phonemes in
the numbers and in my friend's salary joke. If this be the case, then we here
have an instance of a submorphemic transformational component.
It is here time to include an interpretation of a text I wrote some time ago,
around the same time as I wrote the other text rendered above. This was likewise
written by a socalled schizophrenic. Before I add it here, I cannot help noticing
that this text now comes by a tranformational movement from an earlier position
in the total text I am writing, from an earlier position in the linear disentangling
of reality in time:
The following text was written by a schizophrenic (source Arieti 1974:265):
1 Do I see cake Do I do the reverse of acting
2 Yes Do I feel sensually deceived
3 thoughts in mental suggestion in increase of
4 senses in suggestion
5 senses deceptive
6 in in deception deception deception
7 deception
8 vanilla lemon as lemon vanilla as the beginning
9 of in in suggestion suggestion suggestion
10 suggestion of the suggestions as the
11 beginning of in suggestion
12 lemon vanilla as susceptibility of the
13 reason as lemon as in in suggestion
14 suggestion suggestion suggestion of
15 the suggestions
16 insuggestion
17 iv
18 DoIseeIdo in sugget
We here see an elegant poetic formulation of a philosophical view which basically
seems to deal with Platonic problems. In line 2, it is asserted that there is
sensual deception (perhaps as an immediate response to the sensual observation
in line 1), while in line 3, thoughts or mentality is associated with 'suggestion'.
It is reasonable to interpret this in line with the Platonic view expounded
in the Republic, whereby the classic dichotomy between knowledge derived from
the senses and knowledge derived from the properties of mind is set forth. The
former, 'doxa' or opinion, is shifting and unreliable, that is, deceptive, while
the latter is built on the properties of mind itself (such as, for example,
geometry, which is not principly dependent on any sensorial observation), or,
as it is termed in this poem, it appears by mental suggestion. This is the dichotomy
(between the senses and the mind, and the suggestiveness and the deception)
which seems to drive the present text.
However, even senses suggest as well, and mind builds or suggests 'in increase
of' the senses in suggestion, which then should be taken to mean that
1) senses suggest,
2) senses deceive, and
3) thoughts suggest,
as appears successively from lines 3, 4 and 5. Now there is a fourth combinatorial
possibility which immediately presents itself here, and that is the obvious
possibility that
4) thoughts deceive.
It is not explicitly mentioned anywhere, but it appears formally as the central
theme of the poem, which strongly focusses on the combinatorial properties of
language. From these, it will emerge that even the fourth possibility, that
thoughts deceive, is a function of the inherent formal properties of language.
This gives four degrees of knowledge:
1) The deception of the senses,
2) the suggestion of the senses,
3) the deception of the reason, and
4) the suggestion of the reason.
These seem, then, to correspond closely to the four levels of knowledge outlined
by Plato in the Republic. This epistemology is set forth in the simile of the
line. This line, which represents knowledge in total, is divided into two sections,
and each of these sections are subdivided in an equal ratio, as if the ratio
were a principle superimposed on the two sections. The four resulting sections
represent the four forms of knowledge, and the relative size (length) of each
such subsection seems to correlate with the relative status or function in the
inquiring mind (although, it must mentioned, the meaning of assigning a certain
relative length to the subsections is far from clear by Plato).
Hence if Platonic 'doxa' pertains to the knowledge derived from the senses,
and 'epistEmE' is the knowledge by the properties of the mind, we can see the
text's two central notions of sensation vs. thought, mental activity and reason
as reflecting these Platonic categories. Furthermore, the poem's notions of
deception/suggestion can then be seen as a principle superimposed on these two
basic categories, to render the four stages of knowledge represented in eikasia,
pistis, dianoia, and finally noEsis. Although this parallel with Plato's theory
of knowledge should not be taken too far, the parallel is nevertheless quite
suggestive, and may well contribute to a review of Plato's epistemology as set
forth in this context.
However, the poem does what Plato does not do, viz., it shows the process
of reason by sensation in its formal structure. The very perception or sensation
of the phonetic form in which the idea is set forth in this poem self-refers,
in fact, to the process of forming knowledge from senses. This is shown by the
strong emphasis on form, such as the meaning assigned to the repetitive pattern
as well as the notable symmetry in the poem, which has three basic parts: Lines
1-7 form the beginning, in which the three first possibilities are set forth.
Then comes the middle part in lines 8-11, where the combinatorial principle
emerges as that which necessitates the deceptiveness of thought as well. Finally,
the consequences (of deception of thought) are drawn in the last part, in lines
12-18. This gives 7 + 4 + 7 lines as the broad formal structure of the poem.
The three first (immediate) possibilities appear formally as the threefold repetition
of 'deception' in line 6, whereupon a fourth instance occurs in line
7. It is this fourth instance which points to the fourth possibility, that is,
the deceptiveness of thought. This follows in fact from the mental suggestion
of combinatorial possibilities, mentioned in line 3. The text exposes as such
the crucial paradox of thought: That it creates its own negation by the very
epistemological force it assigns to its own working by the combinatorial potential
inherent in linguistic units.
This is most clearly visible in the formal structure of the poem as that which
carries this principle. In line 8, it is exemplified in terms of 'vanilla lemon
as lemon vanilla', which we can represent more in line with linguistic habits
in the form of
vanilla lemon
lemon vanilla
These metaphors are not without semantic motivation, since vanilla and lemon
are extremely clear exponents of binaryvalued phonological features. They share
the colour yellow (as well as other features, such as being edible, being liquid
(if the lemon is squeezed), and so forth, while they are binarily opposed as
sweet vs. sour, or, perhaps better stated, as [+ sweet] vs. [- sweet]. Hence
they come to represent a semantics which amounts to a feature YELLOW which can
attain the two opposed values sweet and non-sweet (or sour and non-sour):
sweet sour or: +sweet -sweet
sour sweet -sweet +sweet
This is the first formal linguistic principle utilized in the poem, and it is
to be found on the phonological level. The other principle is the one which
is already exposed in lines 6 and 7, resulting in the combinatorial possibility
that thoughts deceive, but now repeated in the middle part with a deepened meaning
as it is reinforced by the phonological principle represented in vanilla vs.
lemon. Lines 8-11 can be conveniently rewritten as follows:
vanilla lemon as lemon vanilla
(as the beginning of)
-----------------------------------------------------
| in in suggestion suggestion suggestion |
| suggestion |
------------------------------------------------------
of the suggestions
(as the beginning of)
--------------------------
| in suggestion |
--------------------------
This exposes the other linguistic principle, which now is to be found on the
syntactic level. It consists in the fundamental syntactic principle of nested
dependencies by self-embedding, whereby a syntactic construction AB can
be embedded in itself to create the string AABB, where the inner AB is embedded
in the outer. It was proven by Chomsky
(1959) that there is one and only one formal principle which distinguishes a
context-free phrase structure grammar from a learnable finite state grammar,
and this principle is precisely the property of self-embedding: "If L is
a type 2 [= context-free phrase structure grammar] language, then it is not
a type 3 (finite state) language if and only if all of its grammars are self-embedding"
(p.167). The self-embedding is shown formally in the poem by the expansion of
the normal phrase 'in suggestion' to the form 'in in suggestion suggestion',
corresponding to an AABB. This construction can be generated by a context-free
phrase structure grammar, but it cannot principly be generated by a finite state
grammar.
The interesting distinction to be made here is that a finite state grammar can
be learned from a corpus of speech, as it is based on conditional transition
probabilities. It can be used to construct a pushdown automaton with a finite
memory. The theoretical construct of a pushdown automaton with an infinite memory
is equivalent to a context-free phrase structure grammar, but such infinite
memory is not available to human cognitive processing. It was Chomsky's purpose
to show that human language is infinitely creative, with the corollary that
it cannot be generated by a pushdown automaton with a finite memory, and hence
human grammar must be on the form of phrase structure grammars. However, this
cannot be derived from experience, which implies, as is the cornerstone of Chomskyan
grammar, that the fundamental principles of human grammar are innate.
This is exactly what the poem is about on the syntactic level when it makes
use of the potential inherent in the principle of self-embedding. It thus seems
to say that there are inherent properties of the mental equipment, which also
governs language, in such a way that thought is not free, but, there will be
mental suggestion: The mind has properties which creates structure, and
this structure governs thought. This is the mental suggestion.
Now, what the poem actually says in the middle part, is that the crucial sensation
of 'vanilla lemon as lemon vanila', which associates these sensations with the
organization of the phonological level by binary-valued features, is formed
as the beginning of 'in in suggestion suggestion suggestion suggestion'.
This beginning is, then, precisely the exposition of the principle of self-embedding
imposed on a phrase.
That is, it says that the fundamental syntactic property of mind (the innate
capacity for self-embedding) is transposed onto the phonological level, and
we will take this to indicate the principle which generates the schizophrenic
knowledge-space which, I assume, it is the point of the text to approach an
understanding of. This slightly surprising point is reinforced towards the end
of the text.
Furthermore, it associates this creative (suggestive) aspect of mind with the
deceptive knowledge of the senses (embodied in the sense-values of the sweet/sour
vanilla/lemon).
Hence there are two fundamental formal properties exposed in the text:
1) The binary-valued phonological features which govern the phonological
level, and
2) the self-embedding formal property of the syntactic level.
When there are four units arising from the combinatorial possibilities of two
binary-valued features (that is, ++, +-, -+, and - -), then we can find a principled
explanation to why 'suggestion' must be mentioned four times: It is exactly
the same principle which generates the four possible states of knowledge, wherein
there is the state 'thoughts deceive' as the fourth.
In fact, Bleuler
(1911:21) mentions a similar case: "Ein Hebephrene kam von den Begriffen
'Liebe' und 'haben' nicht mehr los und assoziierte spontan w‰hrend langer
Zeit Reihen wie die folgende: 'Liebe, Diebe, Gabe, Dame, haben, Liebe, Diebe,
Gaben, Dame, haben, Liebe, Diebe, zur¸ckgenommen, zur¸ckgenommen,
zur¸ckgenommen, zur¸ckgenommen, haben, ...'". Again, there
is the emphasis on the phonological level in the minimal or near-minimal pairs,
and then four times (if we can trust Bleuler's report) mention of the word 'zur¸ckgenommen',
which phonologically is completely different. Hence there are minimal pairs
for the phonological level, and one word mentioned four times, just as in the
present text.
The syntactic level is present in the self-embedding of 'in suggestion', which
means that both levels are present in the expanded form above, building on the
basic expression 'in suggestion' (which semantically, then, points to the innateness
of grammar or mental disposition for knowledge).
This suggests, then, that language and its formal properties are precisely what
form thought out of sensation, and which therefore makes a reality out of the
principle 'mental suggestion'. It is, then, exactly these formal properties
which lead us to the necessary conclusion that there must also exist mental
deception. This radical possibility emerges as with necessity from the formal
principles of natural language, and it is exposed explicitly and formally in
the last part of the poem (lines 12-18), which then typically begins with the
expression 'lemon vanilla', and where it then is explicitly mentioned in line
13 that this deals with reason as lemon. Since lemon is sensation and
therefore potentially deceptive, it follows that even reason may be deceptive.
In fact, this follows from
1) the identification of vanilla/lemon with the syntactic construction
2) the fact that there, again, follows four instances of 'suggestion'.
Hence, by the necessity of the fourth instance, following from purely formal
properties, there follows the necessity of reason as deception. Now this insight
is not mentioned explicitly, but it is indeed shown: Following the same
exposition as in the middle part, after the fourth instance of 'suggestion'
there comes one instance of 'in suggestions', just as above, and then the reason
fails: On line 16, there is the form 'insuggestion', which, on the one hand,
is a simple contraction of the syntactic expression 'in suggestion' into one
word, which then transforms the syntactic principle into the phonological level,
and, on the other hand, this creates a negation of 'suggestion', in analogy
with 'indiscretion', 'indigestion', and so fort. The negation of suggestion,
being the innate formal principle of syntax, should then simply be deception,
such as the term is employed in the present text.
Hence if this is what emerges on line 16, then we see that there is an extremely
condensed and complex thought exposed in this derivation:
1) Deception, as one word or idea, follows for the case of reason from the contraction
of two words in syntactic combination, which therefore creates this concept
(of deceptive reason) by means of reducing syntax to phonotax.
2) Deception of reason follows also from the combinatorial possibilities, which,
again, are generated by what seems to be a syncretism of the two levels (albeit
in a less clear form, perhaps).
These two conclusions follow by two independent trains of thought in the preceding
lines, and they converge on this point in the poem where the deceptiveness of
reason arises from the collapse of the linguistic levels. The most evident instance
of this is the first 'word' in the last line, the form 'DoIseeIdo', which clearly
is a collapsed syntactic construction. It is, though, not just any construction:
It builds on the three first words in the first line, and it takes the form
of the five first words in line 8 (which is the first line in the middle part)
on the basis of the following parallel:
vanilla lemon as lemon vanilla
Do I see I Do
The parallel is complete, and it maps the first three words onto the words which
represent the binary-valued phonological features (vanilla and lemon) at the
same time as it exposes the principle of self-embedding, but now on the phonological
level. This, again, is a remarkably condensed expression, building on the entire
preceding text, for the underlying idea.
At the very end, the poem spins off into what is not only mental deception,
but even sensual deception on a new level such as it is formally visualized
in the last line, wherein 'DoIseeIdo in sugget' looks like a printing error,
but it isn't. Here even the senses come out of balance, and we search for an
explanation which is outside the poem itself, in the printing process, in the
reading of the manuscript, or whatever. The reader may naturally go back to
line 17 as well and ponder the strange form 'iv', for which I cannot find any
reasonable interpretation. Hence the frames of interpretation are expanded in
order to save the reliability of the reader's senses, an expansion which, then,
amounts to the schizophrenic expansion of the poetic self. As the poem
comes to the end, the reader's attention suddenly expands dramatically, to transcend
the limited range of attention which has been established throughout the above
lines, and it then closely follows the development of schizophrenic self-experience
on basis of schizophrenic logic.
If, then, one loops back to the beginning of the poem, since 'DoIseeIdo' evidently
builds on the first sentence 'Do I see cake', one finds that the sensual 'cake'
has disappeared (that is, in the last line), and the sentence backtracks to
its beginning before this point is reached. In a curious way, this also seems
to be connected with the the second sentence in the first line ('Do I do the
reverse of acting') which now receives a new meaning, as if doing the reverse
of acting means backtracking into the innate principles of thought before the
sensuality is reached: Then, perhaps, one is sensually deceived, as is suggested
in line 2. And so forth, in a real loop.
In short, the poem shows the epistemological basis for the schizophrenic
state as directly induced and repeatedly reinforced by the linguistic determination
of thought, and how thought and the collapse of ordinary thought derive from
the same formative principles. The difference between normal and schizophrenic
thought amounts, then, to the collapse of the two levels of phonological and
syntactic organization.
The poem thus says that schizophrenia arises when language loses its double
articulation and the innate principles of syntax suddenly appears with an organizing
function on the submorphemic level.
Had the poem ended with the conclusion that schizophrenic thought transposes
the formal properties of syntax onto the phonological level, it would have been
a somewhat nice telling of the story of schizophrenia. But it goes further!
It not only says what it says, it shows it in a manner which involves
the reader in a far more intimate manner than can be expected from a philosophical
style which renders the reader untouched. Hence if the reader can follow this,
he or she will experience how the first well-organized sensation in line 1 is
transformed, by the working of the linguistic impact on thought, onto the forms
appearing in the last line, and, as follows naturally from the content of the
poem, the transformation of thought, as this is shaped by the linguistic organization,
as well. Hence the poem does all that which philosophy never could manage, and
it transcends the point where philosophy comes to a halt with paradox. (After
having studied this poem thoroughly, I had a hard day collecting my pieces together).
To a certain extent it can be said that the poem transcends the linear exposition
of thought and employs the formal principle which Hofstadter
(1979) recognizes in Bach's music, Gödel's logic and Escher's prints. If
the knowledge-state arrived at in the last line of the poem is taken back to
enter the poem from the beginning again, we get a Möbius-strip-like effect,
whereby the schizophrenic state will be generated if the reader follows the
thoughts induced by the formal properties of the poem. In this way, the poem
is an expression for how schizophrenic thought arises, and it does so in terms
of a formal exposition. It straightforwardly shows the way to an understanding
of the workings of the communal conciousness, and strongly indicates where one
should start the search for a formalization of this consciousness.
This remarkable achievement is characterized thus by Arieti: "This is a
typical example of word-salad and stereotypies". His interpretation acknowledges,
as an achievement, that the patient, in his chaotic world, nevertheless is content
with being able to see a cake clearly, "something tangible, concrete. And
he later sees lemon and vanilla, colorful and pleasant objects that stand out
in the sea of confusion expressed by abstract words".
How can it be the case that the philosophical and poetic expression is completely
neglected with such a pejorative assessment? One glimpses into a complete misunderstanding
and ignorance underneath a surface of schooled thought. (If this is not it,
we see something which perhaps is far more horrible). The impact of social status
seems to be central here. Had this been published by T.S.Eliot, say, after the
publication of Four quartets (which, indeed, it could well have been), it would
have been hailed by the critics, and it would have received interpretations
far more elaborate than the one suggested here. But since it is written by a
schizophrenic in an insane asylum, it is judged as worthless, and people refuse
to see its content.
This latter point is, though, probably central to the whole situation. When
the schizophrenic spirals into the train of thought exemplified in the poem,
he or she enters a level in which the morphemic reality is no longer stated,
but shown. It is not stated that thought is shaped by the formal
principles of grammar, as it would have been in philosophical discourse, but
it is indeed shown. The reader is invited to follow the author into the vision
beyond this shaping thought formation, which cannot be done with philosophical
discourse. The latter form will need volumes of text to approach the same, in
the course of which the reader will have lots of other things to do, and cannot
ever, even with the help of time, reach the insight in this way, since it is
trapped in the linearity of thought which is exactly what the poem tells about.
But the point of showing rather than telling makes the schizophrenic
vulnerable. He invites the reader, and Arieti rejects him. This is the answer,
and it strongly suggests how it can be the case that schizophrenia is characterized
to a large degree by social withdrawal and dysfunction. The vulnerable language
of showing rather than telling can grow to great heights if it is supported
properly, such as may have been the case with Eliot, or it can lead the speaker
into schizophrenia, if it is rejected. What the reader should be aware of when
reading this text, is that he walks in the poet's mind. The reader is a guest,
and should behave accordingly.
Had the showing been surrounded by sufficient social pomp and circumstance,
it would have been accepted. People ought to see this simple thing: They rely
on the value which the communal consciousness stamps on something in their assessment.
They do not rely on the expression itself. This is the grand error, and it tells
about the power which the communal consciousness exerts on human individuals.
It stamps 'official poet' on T.S.Eliot, and people hail his words. It stamps
'schizophrenic' on this poet, and people underestimate his words. It is difficult
to see how this can come about unless we assume that people heavily rely on
social sanction in their assessment of artistic and philosophical achievement,
rather than on their own capacity for thinking and observing.
Of course, Eliot does not invite people into the concrete experience of the
schizophrenic state, and a part of the reason why this text is so strongly rejected
may be that the rejection is a protective manoeuvre to avoid experiencing the
state. Why? For once, many people cannot enter the state without becoming seriously
disturbed, but, perhaps more importantly, they cannot enter the state and concretely
experience the presence of the consciousness it induces in the reader and then
afterwards continue as if nothing had happened. The process is just as
becoming aware of one's own subconsciousness: It is most often a harsh and unpleasant
discovery which people do what they can to get around. One cannot, of course,
continue to allow oneself freely to indulge in abuses and exploitations to the
same degree as one could before one discovered one's own total self (if, of
course, one did indulge in them, which perhaps one didn't if one ever came to
discover it). It is the same with this state of schizophrenic self expansion:
One cannot, after having discovered it, continue to pretend that there are no
trans-sensual links between people, and, as soon as one has discovered this,
one cannot continue to push mental 'garbage' in projection onto other people.
This of course may be a cost, and it may disturb the artificial differentiatedness
which the society may enjoy when it pushes its exemplars to the front line and
locks up the garbage carriers in insane asylums. If nobody carries these burdens,
the exemplars must carry them on their own, which perhaps make the cover of
society less fancy, but which probably will make it not only more sound, but
by far more efficient and human as well.
(It is worth considering the fact that DSM-IV now opens for disorganized speech
to be a central symptom for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. It is probable that
this poet's expression is (or could have been) a part of the reason why he is
judged by Arieti to be 'a very regressed schizophrenic').
This was the text. It comes in strongly as a different mood in the running diary
text, and intrudes into this mood. Perhaps I should have postponed it to a separate
chapter later. But, then again, it must be here.
This explains the number transformations, the salary joke and the transposed
'L' in last night's voice. These are the products of a syntactic transformational
component working on the phonological level.
In fact, this also suggests that I may now perform a transformation of the telephone
number which was written on the little 'Hebe' trailer, to transform 67677 into
66777, by moving the first 7 to the end of the number. By this schizophrenic
movement I have now succeeded in obtaining the crucial number which occurred
in the car registration numbers BC 77766 and DD 77766 written backwards.
Now the letter combination BC occurred in the number which I saw just before
I returned to my home some half an hour ago (and which suggested a similar transformation
to obtain 66688), and the letter combination DD occurred in the number on the
car parked by the formerly haunted spot today. This car, then, had number
88777. The transformed telephone number yields 66777, which again adds to the
phonemic analysis in minimal pairs, to segment 6 and 8 adjacent to 7.
Conclusion: The mother is driven out of the morphemic symbol.
Notice that this is a true schizophrenic movement: Ordinary people need not
do so if their mothers have not intruded into their symbols. But for a schizophrenic,
this is necessary. The events I have described above show that it is possible,
and it shows that the retreat into the featural stage opens for a true and real
recreation of the world. This is not a metaphor! The world is really
changed!
The second proof:
John Grover: From the diaries 1994-1995
- 1/0 -
Here is the diary entry for 16 February 1995, a the second proof that these
are my ideas which the norsies have tried to pirate, and while doing so, they
are stepping into my ideas without knowing that I made them first. I have put
the title 1/0 on it since it is divided into three parts representing very well
the concepts of 1, / and 0. It has the same function here, in connection with
the assassination of Laurent Kabila on 16 January 2001 and the dormitory bombs
in Hebei in China on 16 March 2001, as the "Dirty Beast in the Revelation"
fragment had for Kursk and Cole. I also present data from another two texts
which go together with this one to constitute a poetic science proof which should
be as convincing as the Dirty Beast proof. Even this time it makes use of the
mid point phenomenon.
16 February 1995:
Last night I understood an old memory which has [VOICE: ruta] puzzled me quite
a lot earlier. I have a very clear remembrance from the age of around 14 years:
A friend of mine and I were walking in a wood of dried-up trees. The bark had
fallen from the trunks, which were left either grey from age or shining wood-white
from the absence of the cover. There were hundreds and hundreds of these trees.
We went from the one to the other and tried their firmness: We pushed on the
trunk, and if it gave in, the tree fell silently and slowly over and moved to
the ground. It was all immensely silent, and no sound was to be heard as the
huge trunk fell to the ground.
I have had this memory for a long time, and it is only in the later years (say,
5-10 years) that I have started pondering the reality in it. The memory is so
clear that I have never questioned its reality in me, but I have started wondering
what sort of wood this could have been. By a second thought, that sort of wood
would have called for more attention and been a public affair. Also, no wood-warder
would have allowed these trees to stand. There must have been some mistake.
It could have been a dream? Maybe, but I have long-since discarded this possibility
due to the vividness of the memory. There is the chance left that I have generated
it internally on basis of a true fragment of reality - say, my friend and I
being in the wood and finding one such tree or two, and then extending it in
imagery to hundreds. Maybe.
Whatever could have been the framework for instantiation of it in the real memory,
I now understand, on basis of the exhibition last Sunday and the education session
from the communal consciousness some time ago, that this wood must have been
the wood of ladders. The peeled trunk leaning against the wall, which I saw
in the exhibition hall, looked exactly like one of these trees. The memory must
be from a higher sphere, even if it should have been generated from a particular
restricted event in real life.
If that be the case, then we went around in that would breaking ladders. No,
we didn't: We went around in the wood and tried the strength of those ladders.
I now understand why kids climb trees.
Later: Curiously, the memory is from the time when I used to read math by myself.
I had done the math for the the eighth and the ninth year already in my seventh,
so I was taken out and given a book in new math and logic. I was sitting by
myself in a separate room reading this book. I found it again last year, and
as I put it on the table, I found that it still opened by itself, on two specific
places which must have attracted my attention particularly: Both of them were
about Cantor's diagonal proof for the uncountability of the power set of the
natural numbers. I was quite surprised by the finding, since it had completely
slipped out of my memory that I was interested in that at that time. However,
as I looked at the text, I recognized it, and I remember that I was puzzled
by the conclusion already then. In fact, I think I must have seen the point
already at that time: The set is countable - but then were is the failure in
Cantor's proof? It was intuitively obvious to me that the proof did not prove
what it was intended to prove, but something else. It must have been this disccrepancy
which attracted my attention at that time, and I now see it clearly why it was
like that: If this proof does not hold, then there is not so much left of the
twentieth century logic. The proof is the Archimedian point on which very much
rests in those areas, and my attention to it was therefore understandable. If
that point did not hold, then the rest would not hold either. This was my concern
throughout last year as well, when I tried to convince the referees in several
math journals that they should take a substantial reconsideration of this corner
stone proof.
As I see it now, this is the same as walking in the wood and pushing the decayed
trees over. It is not only very much the same: It is identically the same.
The day has been 'pushy'. I was up to the library at the university at Blindern
and delivered some books and borrowed another. I also was into the faculty library
in the biology building and the physics building, on both sides of the road.
As I left the physics building, there was a man coming out of it with a newspaper
stand (rack) in his hand. It immediately struck me as significant, but I did
not write it down. It was only later, as I walked downtown and passed the art
school in UllevÂlsveien, that a woman came upwards carrying another stand,
which by closer inspection was a curled-up pram stand. I wrote down in my notebook:
STATIV ('stand' or 'rack').
A little ago I was down to call the university library in Trondheim (Museum
of science) where I have applied for a job. In the intersection Krumgata/Sofiesgate,
BC 80777 passed. I immediately thought of Z. After the call, I went over to
Bislet roundabout to buy another telephone card, and DE 10777 came out from
the roundabout and drove up Theresegate.
Last Sunday was Z's birthday. I thought of it in advance that maybe I should
call her and impress her a little by saying that I still remember her birthday,
but I discarded it as not enough reason, in particular in view of the fact that
she had not really signalled the wish to see me lately. Perhaps I was wrong.
This morning I woke up and thought of her again. The reason is probably to be
found in my yesterday reconsideration of that period in the Institute of informatics,
when I tried to reach Z by mail, but was continuously prevented from it. That
case was just another of the same as earlier, when our friendship was split
by such intruding mechanisms. As I considered it again yesterday, I felt that
a certain degree of 'extrusion' was performed on it, and this could have been
the reason why she repeatedly came to my mind this morning. However, the answer
to this was clearly found in these two occurrences with only some ten minutes'
interval.
Another strange incidence: During the talk with the woman at the Museum of science,
a significant car, with number 15556, passed. I was convinced that the letter
combination was DH, but there was a slight moment of uncertainty since I was
occupied with the conversation and therefore could not really pay attention
to it. Now I looked at my notes for today, and see that DF 15556 was the first
registrered number today. if these were indeed distinct numbers, the case is
remarkable: I have made no recordings of this number before, and now it occurs
twice on the same day. If these were distinct (DF and DH), it is all the more
remarkable. Curiously, if it was DH, then it makes a minimal pair with DH 15555
observed yesterday, and with JR 15555 observed on the 12th.
Comment to the diary entry: When it comes to the question
of countability in the second part here, it is perhaps to the point to make
a distinction between countability as orderability and countability as equinumerality
with the set N of natural numbers. Cantor's proof rests on the foundations of
'flat' symbolic logic and has the flaw that it presupposes epistemological or
even ontological reality of the 'uncountability' property. Cantor microscoped
the power set of N and found traces of the substance 'uncountability', a matter
which was called "the philosopher's stone" by the alchemists. And
since he could prove that there was a grain of uncountability in the set, it
followed that uncountability exists. He concluded from this that there had to
exist sets which had a bigger infinity than the ordinary small infinity of the
natural numbers. I take this to be a flaw in the reasoning: What Cantor proved
was that it was impossible to give the power set (the set of all sets) a linear
ordering which you could print in a (very long) book. That is a matter of semantics,
as I see it. It means that there exists arbitrary signification for which you
cannot make a motivated mapping by a principled description. It means that reality
decomposes into levels of reality which are mutually incommensurable, and for
which you cannot make one consistent description. It means that poetry or divine
revelation breaks through the levels like sunrays through the clouds. Cantor
was out for assessing the mathematical staus of God and was put in a madhouse
for that. But to prove that there are incommensurable semantic levels of knowledge,
incommensurable for example due to the limited cognitive capacity of humans,
does not mean that there are bigger and bigger infinities. If it does, then
infinity is a matter of semantics, not a matter of number (unless number is
semantics, which of course it also can be, but then arithmetics is not the same).
The infinity of N is big enough, I think, since it is infinite. Modern linear
symbolic logic works with the concept of infinity + 1, infinity + 2, and so
forth, up to infinity + infinity. >From there they start counting (2 infinities)
+ 1, (2 infinities) + 2, and so forth. This strange logic is swallowed by rational
beings only because of Cantor's proof, and there are many lifetimes' work based
on the assumption that the conclusion in the proof does hold good. I think it
is a sensible conclusion to say that Cantor proved the insufficiency of linear
symbolic logic - and that is the reason why the logicians talk about infinity
+ 1 and so forth. Unorderability of the counting procedure means that the linear
decomposition of reality, from the poetic to the alphabetic reality, cannot
preserve the full semantic quality which it should have had. It really says
that the alphabet is not enough. Cantor was put in the madhouse for his discovery,
and was forced to conclude that infinity + 1 is good enough in order to get
out again. It is all about the breakdown of the alphabetic culture which was
established some 3500 years ago. That is also what the full diary entry is about.
The diary entry for 24 August 1998:
A poetic logic can be pursued here which perhaps may reveal some interesting
things about the background of the Kabila and Hebei cases. The Dirty Beast proof
rests partly on the special property of it that it contained another text which
had been inserted into it on that particular date. There is another such case,
a smaller one, on 24 August 1998, with considerable evidential value relative
to the US embassy bombs in Kenya and Tanzania 17 days before. Here it is:
24 August 1998: In the last days (more than a week, in fact), my
left ankle and foot have been painful. Now it has spread somewhat to the righthand
sole, less though. It feels as if I am losing the strength in these two feet.
What can it be? It feels as if the earth is so hard when I walk on it, that
I can hardly walk on it.
***
This is the poem I wrote in March:
I fell into a restless sleep
one Sunday afternoon.
I felt I heard somebody weep, (I thought I heard...)
so near to me, so soon.
So clear it sounded, like a bell
in spring, on heather land,
as of a sheep it should foretell,
or of a leperous man.
I reached my hand out in my bed
where sleep had taken me.
There was a buzzing in my head:
Had angels shaken me?
I saw a window slamming up
in the harsh winter storm. (in the strong winter storm)
The hasp and catch were hammering, but
the frame was still a form.
I heard a weeping from the moon
as from a violin
one Sunday in the afternoon
in the strong winter wind. (in the harsh winter wind)
It was in the waiting for Lavinia Greenlaw's reply. Now there was this exhibition
from Lithuania here. I went out to see the paintings from Kaunas. The whole
exhibition was mirrored around a mid point where I saw my name in three pictures
and one window in one.
This diary entry reproduced the poem such as it was written. There are some
difficulties in it, though. In particular the window is difficult: "The
frame was still a form" - it is not entirely clear what that means. I think
it means "The frame was telephone", which here probably means "the
frame was Xenophone". Compared with the diary entry for 16 February 1995,
there are three pictures (1/0) and one window in one, where I find my name.
For the story of Hebei and Kabila, it is interesting to compare with the Tekoa
victims in Israel at the visit of Thorbjørn Jagland, Norwegian foreign
minister. The diary entry for 16 February is a remarkably good interpretation
of his name, if it is taken to mean Diagonal --> T.Jagland, and ORB-JÿRN
meaning 'circle-corner' for the 0 and the 1, which is a perfect description
of his name. Mapping onto the 16 February 1995 entry, it is easy to recognize
the same form: 1) The forest of naked (barkless) trees is (the opposite of)
the hard earth, so hard that I can hardly walk on it. 2) The diagonal proof
is the five-stanza poem. 3) The state of indecision and indeterminacy is (the
opposite of?) the mention of my waiting for a reply from LG and of the Kaunas
exhibition.
Now looking up 24 August, the date when this smaller diary entry was written,
in search of some interesting news - I find remarkably good hits on both 2000
and 1998, both of them about Congo and Kabila. On 24 August 2000, Laurent Kabila
finally gave in and decided to admit UN allowance to the country. After this
landmark date, I could not find any interesting piece of news about Congo in
the main world news before the assassination on 16 January 2001. Hence it was
really something. On 24 August 1998, there were the news that troops had reached
Kinshasa, again a rather infrequent piece of information. This means that Congo
is the key to the mapping. First, Congo can perhaps mean just John G-O for John
Grøver, in Africa. Secondly, Congo is on equator, the 'mid point phenomenon'
between the two poles which seem to be represented in the two frames of the
poem: 1) The talk about the earth and the turning of the features there, probably
for the (turning) North Pole. 2) The waiting (not whaling) for Lavinia Greenlaw's
reply, Kaunas, not Vilnius, and my name in a monkeybiz exhibition. The south
pole gives Congo as the mid point phenomenon, but there were difficulties in
Congo - which led to the assassination of Kabila.
The proof
Now there is a proof that these are my ideas even here, just as there was for
the Dirty Beast in the Revelation. Once again it is about a text written at
another time and inserted into the diary text at a later stage. In fact the
present proof is directly related to that proof, which rested on the mid point
phenomenon, as the mid point between 12 August and 12 October, but six years
before. In the present case it is about three years before, and the
proof is given in the beginning of the 'supplement' to the third book in The
Endmorgan Quartet, called Cat-Rufus' Earth. This was published separately as
a leaflet called "The Endmorgan Quartet - a supplement to Cat-Rufus' Earth"
in June 1998. The proof is on the first page, which seems to be about "Grover's
roost", a Poetry Society which is indicated by the one and only poetic
simile (typically on the form "the night was dark as dark can be")
in the whole Endmorgan Quartet, viz., the poetic phrase "superstition as
dark as a black wig". The text goes as follows:
___________________________________________________________________________
Luke 22.54: Then seizing him, they led him away and took him into
the house of the high priest. Peter followed at a distance.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I guess I've been around here,
and I seem I saw many around.
But what is this?
It has two things:
A house
(a place where you can store your things,
a ground,
and superstition
as dark as a black wig),
the sleep (which you suggested are).
How far up were you looking?
I was looking into the second floor,
the first floor
(but in fifteenth it is the second).
She is Emma.
I don't need to have it neutralized,
and I was beginning in next week three.
A hasp, up it went...
- 16 February 1998 -
...a dance of that
at the Kothend library... 5 May 1998
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Here is the proof: It is the date "16 February 1998" which
is three years exactly after the "1/0" entry in the diary (in 1995)
and three years exactly before the mid point between Kabila and Hebei (in 2001),
that is, exactly the mid point in the six years interval which also applies
for the Dirty Beast in the Revelation proof. The reason why this has to
apply to the present case is the presence of the hasp and the catch right before
the date. When I published it, I thought of the hasp as the hasp to the outhouse
loodor and the date as the falling 'date' imitating the function from paradigm
to syntagm in an FFT imitation. The text is about coming into the Kothend Poetry
Library, picking up a book and reading poetry, like in Heraclitus' fragment:
"The best of men prefer one thing in place of everything else: Everflowing
glory from the mortals. And the mortals are glutted like cattle...". It
is about divine revelation and the poetic function, in terms of loopaper and
bit-reversal - or rather vice versa. The text is also in the mid point between
two texts which seem to be associated with Lavinia Greenlaw: The 'Unit and Harper
emend' immediately before and the 'Olivien Leu' text immediately after. (The
new neighbours who moved in here have a white cat called 'Olivien', a wise cat
who sometimes rolls around in the dust or starts chasing flies when it sees
me). Hence the date "16 February 1998" is indeed the mid point and
is a strong proof in itself. That is the reason for it in the text: It is about
universal signification and proves that such knowledge and signification exists,
just like the Dirty Beast proves the subject's awareness of such immensely deep
historic parameters as derives from the Revelation of John and the apparition
in Lourdes.
What is T.Jagland ('Norsie Labour' foreign minister) and the Diagonal doing
in here when this is such an important proof? Probably to represent "Nazi
Labour" as the residues of history: Politicians who like to make history
in order to get power are making monkeybusiness and strive towards getting out
of paradise and into history instead. Assuming that politicians who strive towards
a classless and stateless society strive towards paradise, it turns out that
the labour parties will come into the class of monkeybizing nazi labour parties.
Hence the diary texts (about labour parties) are about this role of history-oriented
political parties who prefer earthly power rather than heavenly paradise, and
hence about the new political divide line between monkeybizers and integritists.
These poetic proofs show the reality of poetry as working with history as a
sort of diachronic clay material for shaping poetic objects. The five-stanza
poem was written on 1 March 1998, the Kothend Library text was written on 5
May 1998, and the diary entry here called "1/0" was written on 24
August 1998. (These related also to the diary from 1994-95). Hence in the course
of the work in these five months, I created a poetic object in the diachronic
dimension, not the least by moving one poem from 1 March and inserting it into
the text on 24 August, which came to be a rather impressive and precise proof
for the reality of the diachronic dimension in poetic science. That proof
is contained in the single date "16 February 1998" mentioned on 5
May and published to legal deposit and copyright registered in June 1998. When
I wrote it, I had no idea why that date, which was suggested by the poetic muse,
had any relevance, and I suppose I would not have found out of it if it were
not for the Kabila and Hebei cases which called for an explanation. I then assume
that Kabila and Hebei are motivated by the similarity of diagonal uncountability
proof and T.Jagland + orb-jørn pirating this proof by
Kabila and Hebei after I had sent out my Dirty Beast proof on 8 January 2001.
Here the definite proof is distributed over three texts which are mutually unrelated
except through this diachronic relationship. Does this mean that the correlation
with the 'norsie labour' politics and the Kabila and Hebei cases is coincidental
and the Norwegians are unrelated to those terrorist acts? Probably not: The
proof is on the government's website in a press release from 16 March 2001,
saying that Tanzania's debt to Norway is to be deleted that day. I tried to
open this press release from an internet cafe and the computer immediately stopped
working and refused to take in any more web pages, so I suppose I had receivoed
a virus from the norsies instead of the revealing press release which tells
of the systematic relation of the Hebei bombings to the US embassy bombings
in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 and my education loan through which I was
supposed to pay back the bombing debt for the norsies. The case is a matter
of the norsies trying to pirate my authorship by their 'labour' foreign minister
Jagland, just as in the cases in Tekoa in Israel and on Sri Lanka, and in many
other comparable cases which call for such investigation.
I should add that the diary fragment from 24 August 1998 was added to the Dirty
Beast text and the Paris/Dakar rally story some time after I first sent out
the Dirty Beast on 8 January. I don't remember exactly when I added it, but
I know that I hesitated with including it (because of its then seemingly remote
relationship to the rest of the story) for several days after the Paris/Dakar
story had been included around 11-12 January, and I think it is safe to say
that 16 January (Kabila) had been reached before I included it for the first
time. At that time, my home Internet connection was sabotaged so I have no copies
of the emails I sent those days, but I remember the hesitation and the postponement
of the inclusion of that 24 August text for a considerable time. Hence the 24
August text can hardly have been part of the motivation for Kabila and Hebei
and that completes the proof.
Foot-and-mouth in England
Now here is the explanation to the foot-and-mouth disease which broke out in
England on 19 February 2001, three days after this 16 February date, diagnosed
on 20 February. Foot-and-Mouth is a rewrite of Foreign-Minister,
and when the foreign minister is called T.Jagland + orb-j¯rn, there
is the diagonal uncountability proof in the foot-and-mouth. The time
span from infection to outbreak of foot-and-mouth is from 24 hours to 10 days,
where three to six days is the average. I suppose it is fair to say that the
disease started on 16 February when the first case was diagnosed on 20 February.
The virus was of subtype O Panasiatic, which rewrites to O Asiat Panic
or Capita Onasi, which gives Kabila Asian. When Onasi is
likely to be associated with schizophrenic, there is Kabila Hebei
(Shijiazhuang) given in the virus type. When the original source of the
virus (according to Maff's website) is supposed to be Heddon on the Wall
in Northumberland, that sounds like a spy camera on the wall in the home
of Ronk Røver, which is a representation of my name. The contaminated
material was supposedly spread airborne to Tyne & Wear, which sounds like
Tony Blear. A Buba-radio spy camera in my home, with direct link to Tony Blear,
that sounds like.
Maff, as they are called, the Ministry of Agriculture, continues the story about
the spreading of the virus: After it had spread by airborne plume to seven farms
in Tyne & Wear, one of these farms sent sheep to Hexham Market,
which sounds like Ulla Heggelund (or Ulla Birgitte Heggelund).
From there some sheep were sent to Longtown (Cumbria), which here
must be Christian Hambro in Oslo. "How the virus reached the Heddon on
the Wall farm is currently the subject of a court investigation". 'Court'
in Norwegian means "horny", so there seems to be at least two stories
told here.
What does this tell?
1. Does it tell quite frankly that foot-and-mouth disease (the 'foreign minister')
is planted in the environment by fraud in order to make an election campaign
for New Labour representing the Monkeybiz Project? That would be by means of
the assassination of Kabila (virus name) representing me (Northumberland, Heddon
on the Wall), the Hebei dormitory bombs (virus name) representing Ulla Birgitte
Heggelund (wooly Market Hexham), Longtown Cumbria for Christian Hambro, the
Podujevo bus bombing in British KFOR district on 16 February (leading to the
arrest of an 'ethnic Albanian rebel' who escaped from prison as an 'inmate on
the run' when the foreign minister later arrived there again), as well
as the distribution of the disease which told the story of the Monkeybiz Project
in terms of the placenames of the affected farms: Cumbria (Hambro), Dumfries
and Galloway (John Bjarne Grover), Devon (Even Hovdhaugen), County Durham (Ronk
Røver), Wales (the application) were the most strongly infected, in that
order, and told the story of the Monkeybiz Project as it was. Hence it would
be imitating a storytelling from heaven. If this be the alternative by fraud,
then the responsibles representing the Monkeybiz Project, as a bunch of liers,
cheaters, bandits, terrorists, are not of course entitled to rule any country,
and the loud facefarting would have the function of preventing that the Monkeybiz
Project be stopped and subjected to investigation (which it certainly will in
any case).
2. The strange story told between the lines, in the dates of the outbreak, the
name of the virus, the placenames where it started, the distribution of the
disease over the placenames telling the story: This would rather be a sort of
fairy-tale principle in the development of the epidemic. Indeed a great discovery!
A monumental discovery on the development and etiology of epidemics which can
lead to the solution of AIDS and should call for at least a Nobel prize or something
similar, and certaily should elicit project funding almost immediately.
Now the question is which alternative you believe in here. If 1, and that was
part of new Labour's election campaign (and that would probably have been the
reason why Mandelson resigned a couple of days after my application for political
asylum or something equivalent - resigning for a second time in order to retain
his political career even after it had been discovered), then it is time to
arrest Tony Blair, I suppose. If 2, then the big mystery is this: Why haven't
I got project funding yet?
Whatever alternative be the case, I suppose I can expect to receive money. Send
the money today, do not wait till tomorrow.
Whatever be the reality, here is the proof that foot-and-mouth relates directly
to my millenium project - and is a result of the devastating Monkeybiz Project.
The solution to it, whatever be the reality, would be to grant me money for
doing the project which so many have profited from, including New Labour in
their election campaign. If money had been granted and the disease had a natural
origin, I would predict that the spread of foot-and-mouth would stop, and a
similar mechanism could be proposed for other epidemics. But when those money
were not granted, foot-and--mouth continued to spread, and only brute methods
such as slaughtering was attempted. I wrote to David King, who was appointed
by Blear for the socalled 'Cobra Group' established to stop the spread of the
disease, that the disease could be stopped simply by sending some money to me,
but nothing happened. No whistling could be heard. How is that possible?
It means perhaps that Blair prefers monkeybusiness in the sense of history,
and maybe making history is his highest aspiration? That politics is
doomed to fail, of course, because the essence of it is to do the wrong thing
and to lead the people into trouble. Today the time has come to lead
the people out of history and into paradise instead. Then the right thing is
to send me money.
But maybe it is difficult for a politician to send me money if that means that
politics has seen its limits? Maybe there is a poetic revolution going on which
is not about making history but about making poetic objects in paradisial
diachrony.
Antarctica
I have sent the following on Antarctica to several sources since Sunday 15 April
2001:
Antarctica is the symbol of the collective global consciousness which is just
now about to undergo formalization by the formalization of time, like its frozen
water. That is probably what it was there for through all the millions of years
- as if the eternal ice was left there as a secret escape route back to paradise.
As I have shown in my studies, an apparition technology will be constructed,
to function on the interface between the individual's subjective cognition and
the global consciousness which is about to undergo formalization and hence be
susceptible to a formal logic. This future apparition technology may make it
possible to communicate with remote parts of the universe, and then Antarctica
may be of essential importance for just that. Then it is important that this
global concern be not controlled by any particular states. There may be many
good reasons to turn it into an international protectorate under UN. To have
to face eternal monkeybusiness due to a melting ice cap would be a tragedy for
humanity.
I wrote the following on Easter Day, when I woke up to a White Christmas Day:
Norway in the global community
- A word on Antarctica -
John Grover
The last years have seen a remarkable global phenomenon in the socalled Monkeybusiness
Project (see my studies on that, and below), wherein the Norwegians have played
a significant and rather disastrous role. What was intended as a global constructive
and creative project was turned into a destructive and disastrous project under
the pirate monkeybusiness flag, leaving thousand and thousands of dead and tens
of thousands crippled, along with a selfish manifestation of politics as unwilling
to give up its destructive power where a contructive development would have
lent less power to politics but better conditions for the global community.
The Norwegians have been in the forefront of this destructiveness. What is the
reason for this role of the Norwegians and what can be done to heal the damages
or at least prevent that the same happens again?
I have concluded that there are four aspects of Norwegian mentality which is
the reason for the sad development of the millenium project:
1. They play the blockhead game
2. Then they turns things around to let others look like blockheads
3. They are formal and claim their rights under the pirate flag
4. The errors they create in this way tend to spread all over the globe
There is a fifth element which is essential here, and that is the natural comparison
with the nazis: How come the Norwegians behave like immature norsies and contribute
to spread death and destruction over the globe in a way which is quite comparable
to the nazi tragedies? And how come they manage to uphold their image of a modern
and progressive state under such circumstances?
I have found that there is an answer to this which has to do with a very special
role of Norway in the global community: Antarctica.
Norway has made territorial claims to a very large part of Antarctica and therefore
a very large part of the globe's surface, and they may come to claim ownership
to this large part of the surface of the globe. They may perhaps even happen
to claim that because it was a Norwegian who was the first to reach the South
Pole. What a joke!
 |
Norwegian terrorists make territorial claim for Antarctica |
The reason why Antarctica can be taken to be the explanation to the Norwegian
tragedies is that it eminently meets the four points mentioned above. Antarctica
is the ice cap, the blockhead of the globe (point 1), and it is on the other
side of the globe relative to Norway, which means that it serves to turn things
around for the norsies when it contributes to their activities and interpretations
of global events (point 2). It is a cold and formal skeleton landscape which
has much in common with the skeleton as the trademark of formal pirates, such
as the norses in recent years have specialized in (point 3). Finally, it is
a global phenomenon and therefore it fuels the global spread of the Norwegian
errors (point 4), not the least by the carrying force in the formalisms, leading
to much catastrophes and suffering elsewhere on the globe. The unfortunate global
support for the Norwegian role in the monkeybusiness project may perhaps be
explained by that.
 |
Antarctica's position on other side of globe no obstacle to determined Norway |  |
A cold and formal skeleton |
The Norwegians seem unfortunately not mature for the ownership of Antarctica
- as their role in the last years' Monkeybusiness Project with its rooting in
Norway has shown. Therefore they are naturally considered as norsies, immature
norsies, and behave like the immature nazis who also suffered from a faith in
monkeybusiness. But the norses are probably not interested in giving Antarctica
away, since there can be riches under the ice cap if only they could make it
melt away. Global warming has been the trademark of the monkeybusiness project
in recent years, and the norsies are formalists in the forefront of that. Everybody
knows that farting is not and cannot be forbidden, due to individual variation
in metabolism, muscular control, etc., and occasional emission of gases should
not, due to basic human rights, lead to serious social punishment. But that
does not mean that farting is permitted! But the immature norsies are formalists
and cannot understand this: Either it is forbidden, or it is permitted. There
should be no grey zones in the laws, they say. Therefore they take pleasure
in farting loudly at the table, and claim their basic human rights to do so.
They can even take it to court if necessary, claiming reparation from the host
for showing offending signs of contempt when he is frowning at his guests when
they fart at the table. That is their wrongway pirate flag. Under this pirate
flag, they will take pleasure in seeing the ice cap melt due to all the global
warming, if only they own the riches underneath the skeleton ice.
Hence a certain responsibility is required of a nation if it is to own a part
of Antarctica, and there is the danger that the norsies are not really mature
for that. They are only four million people and their administrative share of
Antarctica is big. In fact, it is likely that the Norwegian tragedies (blockheadism,
wrongwayism, formalism, monkeybizm) is due directly to the role of this vegetating
ice cap on the other side of the globe which seems to be so defining for their
nature, with the typical Norwegian formalist wrongwayism on the other side.
Maybe even the norsies can grow up to mature social beings if they are relieved
of this pressure. It is indeed likely that the administrative duties and rights
to a large part of the globe's surface which is in the conditions of Antarctica
will have to be formative for the mentality of the people who administers it
and be defining for their role in the global community. In particular so when
the share of the globe's surface is big and the norses are few. I suppose that
at least a part of the unfortunate mentality of the norsies in the later years
can be explained by that.
My suggestion is this: Turn Antartica into an international protectorate under
UN, such as the Pope has suggested for the eternal city Jerusalem. The Jews
invented the alphabet, which was a great cultural achievement, and the parallel
is otherwise suggestive in the sense that 1) the alphabet is located in the
temporal lobes, 2) it invokes otoacoustic emissions, 3) it is categorical on
sensorial acoustic material, and 4) it supports or even depends on monkeybusiness.
The comparison is interesting also by the opposite roles: While Jersualem is
small and the Jews formerly were scattered over a good part of the globe, the
norsies are few and the ice cap is covering a good part of the globe. Maybe
that can explain something about the Jews and the nazis. The development of
nazism went in parallel with the territorial claims in Antarctica, also the
Norwegian territorial claims formalized in 1939 which followed after a horrible
holocaust among the poor innocent whales in the Antarctic seas. And while it
seems as if norsie interests have been the reason for some of the latest trouble-making
in the Middle East, Antarctica could be the reason for that.
But if the norsies claim ownership to a part of Antarctica because they were
the first to go there, then they better mature a little quickly and hurry up
and send me money immediately! I was there first, and the monkeybizers, with
their disrespect for the creative source, came there afterwards. And my landscape
is not a formalist skeleton landscape.
15 April 2001
The Monkeybusiness Project explained
With this account of Antarctica which I wrote on Easter Day, it is now possible
to explain the devastating Monkeybusiness Project, a fact which otherwise seems
as difficult to explain as the massive support for the nazis in Germany in the
1930's: How is it possible that such monkeybizers as the norsies have received
so much support around the world? The answer is that Antarctica represents the
road to eternity and the norsies have made territorial claims for a sizable
chunk of it. The reason for the undue support is that humans consider eternity
right whatever it says. But time has now come for accessing eternity technologically.
Antarctica will be used for topographical mapping of remote galaxies for universal
signification, and that is a global concern which requires total absence of
ownership claims or other national control mechanisms. To have norsies controlling
a sizable chunk of eternity is out of the question. The confidence in the Monkeybusiness
Project will also certainly disappear quickly with the disappearance of national
territorial claims, something which also can lead to major progress in e.g.
the Middle East and the comparable eternal city. Antarctica should be turned
into an international protectorate as soon as possible. The norsies have no
right to cork the access to eternity.
The bodily metaphors for control of the universal language recently received
an interpretation in the standoff in Beijing after the Chinese had forced a
US spy plane to land. It can be argued that attempts to control the expressions
of universal language by hemispheric tension is not optimal, as the standoff
also proved, and many will argue that oldfashioned muscular control (by an inner
circle) is preferrable. But there is an alternative! That is in dieting, a word
which alternates in an interesting way with diaring: A diary is a record of
subjective diachronic observations and is in principle the prerequisite for
the establishment of the new formal logic on the interface between the subjective
and the global (or universal) cognition. It implies that only integrity can
lead to a true logic, and monkeybusiness is principly out. Put differently,
while adding 2 + 2 = 5 gives an error message in the schoolchild's notebook
today, in a future school the same error message pops up when monkeybusiness
is detected. Hence diaring is what leads to the establishment of a formal logic
for the global domain.
In contrast, dieting in the sense of vegetarianism, eating only vegetables or
wedgetables, may be the new solution including the new 'cuneiform' which reduces
the global warming of the alphabetic culture.
Dieting and diaring alternate in terms of the feature consonantal, which I have
shown indicates arbitrarity in signification. The consonantal dieting will imply
arbitrarity in global signification while the diaring will imply motivatedness
in the same global signification. Sentential arbitrarity in the global domain
is my model, while sentential motivatedness is Chomskyan grammar.
The Middle East crisis and its solution
- A letter sent around on 22 May 2001 -
The tension in the Middle East is rising and there is a reason for that. The
reason is this:
1. A closer study of the Hamas suicide bombings shows that their deepest motive
is the wish
for peace, not aggression.
2. But Israel cannot accept suicide bombings in their streets, because their
deepest wish is
peace and not aggression.
3. This shows that the real reason for the rising tension is somewhere else.
Where?
i) Israel and Palestine are always in the top news because they interpret the
global narrative.\parii) My project is also always in the top news because it
is about global signification.
iii) Then when I run out of money, the global project suffers and the Middle
East conflict breaks
out again.
The solution to the Middle East crisis is to send money to me. That is also
because my ideas have a very large spread and I have not yet been credited.
That may be a part of the reason for the renewed conflict in the Middle East.
The Israeli attacks on Palestine say that the source must be credited.
In fact my project faced the need for money in September last year. That is
when the conflict started again.
See what happens. It is about this.
Hence, find somebody who can donate money to my project, and the Middle East
crisis may be solved.
Best wishes,
John Grover
Added on 21 May:
After I emailed most of the above to Israel on 20 May, the following happened
in the following night:
http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/05/21/LatestNews/LatestNews.26624.html
- my name and the name of Jens Erik Fenstad who rejected my PhD.
http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/05/21/LatestNews/LatestNews.26628.html
- my address in Snipiskes district in Vilnius, and Mandell-son's house for my
"Mandelson and the Poet Laureate" as part of my authorship.
Israeli airplanes bomb SEKurity installation, and so forth. Please understand
what this is about.
WHO Director-General Gro Harlem Brundtland is quoted by Jerusalem Post the same
day as criticizing Israel, saying that acute shortages of drugs (Junk) as well
as problems in resupplying remote facilities (Roever) had harmed health care
services. Isn't this the Norwegian state terrorism installed in a UN organ?
Tuberculosis (tub-jerk-you-low-sits) day in WHO is about Norwegian state policy.
And so forth.
Hence the solution to the Middle East crisis is to donate money to me. I have
asked UNESCO many times, but have not received answer. Maybe the WHO case can
explain it? But WHo is not UNESCO and perhaps somebody could convince UNESCO
that it is time to support me instead of the Norwegian state terrorism which
has made things so difficult in Israel.
John Grover
PO Box 2943
2000 Vilnius
Lithuania
email: johgrov@yahoo.com
Bank accounts:
070.48348 in Vilniaus Bankas, Gedimino Pr.12, Vilnius, Lithuania (SWIFT:
CBVI LT 2X)
6094.15.61716 in Kreditkassen, Norway - I don't know if the account works
properly but I hope so)
You can also send a crossed cheque to my PO Box. Donors will receive a letter
from me. If that does not arrive, it would mean that the cheque has not reached
my PO Box, for example due to a bribe somewhere inbetween. There has not been
much mail, with a couple of exceptions there have been only mail from Norway
(and that has been rejections and bills!) through the last year. So it can of
course be that the Norwegians have bribed a link somewhere. That would also
have contributed to the new Middle East tension.
I suppose anonymous donations are also possible (without reply letter, then),
but I am not sure of the rules. The relevant authorities will in any case be
notified of all donations.
Do you find it unlikely that the norses can bribe away my letters? Certainly
not. If I were to get a job to earn some money, they would probably bribe the
employer to have me fired for a trifle. So my chances are small. For example
Statoil, Telenor, the research council, the university, the government - those
could invest in that because they have made themselves interesters in my authorship.
And of course they would never dream of supporting me with money - even if they
use my work for marketing themselves. Instead, the norses have rejected all
my applications and timed the rejections with international terror. That is
another reason why somebody should donate money to me.
Letter, 23 May 2001, on Saad Eddin Ibrahim
(Most of this letter was sent to the Egyptian authorities on 23 May 2001).
http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/05/22/egypt.rights/index.html
on Saad Eddin Ibrahim, the Egyptian dissident who was sentenced to seven years
in prison in a record swift trial recently.
Reasons for concern:
Enclosed a study of the corrupt Monkeybiz Project which has integrated much
into my authorship. There are strong links to the case of Ibrahim in the cases
of Barbara Ann Ford, Manuel Giminez and the bombing of Hotel Torre de Cali recently,
such as this relates to the Pope's visit to the mosque at Saladin's tomb in
Syria:
1. The most important theoretical concept in my authorship is the arbitrary
sentential sign. I have repeatedly emphasized that this is a linguistic concept
and not judicial - and hence 'arbitrary sentences' in court have nothing to
do with my theory but there have nevertheless been some cases which look like
travesties on my concept as part of the Monkeybiz Project.
2. Saad Eddin Ibrahim sounds here like Saladin Ibrahim. My book "Birds
to Saladin" is a relevant interpretation of the Pope's visit to the mosque
at Saladin's tomb next to the shrine where St.John the Baptist's head according
to tradition is kept.
3. This was also the target of the correlated terror acts against Hotel Torre
de Cali in Colombia recently along with the Barbara Ann Ford and Manuel Giminez
cases. The hotel was bombed in the night to Saturday, the nun Barbara Ann Ford
was shot down on Saturday, and Giminez was shot down on Sunday at the time when
the Pope entered the mosque in Syria. I think there are very good reasons to
see these as interrelated and related to my authorship - where you also find
the 'arbitrary sentential sign' as essential.
4. My first reaction to the case of Barbara Ann Ford in Guatemala was that it
was motivated with the name-similarity with the police officer Jurga Barbariene
who handled my application for a renewed temporary residence permit in Lithuania.
I think perhaps it was the ministry who had handled the case after I went there
but it was Barbariene who was the first and last contact in the renewed process.
Hence her role was somewhat like Bodil Stenseth in the Torre de Cali bombing.
The contact with the immigration office was also marked by the car bomb in Pristina
which was 'announced' by a telephone to me in the morning, of exactly the same
kind as 'announced' the assassination of Stephen Saunders in Athens last year,
an assassination which seems to have been made in order to link Statoil significationally
with me and with Lavinia Greenlaw's name ("TV-and-unders" after rewrite
by L/T for Lithuania, leaving my name as Onr Over). The car bomb exploded right
outside the visa office in Pristina in the moment when I was into the visa office
of Jurga Barabriene. (I think the time point was the importance thing there,
though, but the telephone rang probably in the very moment when the letter from
that visa office - from Barbariene, that would be - fell into my mailbox and
I could go to the visa office). Hence a relation to the name Jurga Barbariene
is not improbable. It was in fact my first response which I mentioned in a letter
to US State Department.
5. Even if that name-similarity between Barbara Ann Ford and Jurga Barbariene
should not be essential for understanding the rest of the complex, it seems
to recur here when Ibrahim's wife is called Barbara Ibrahim. I even reported
to the Lithuanian Foreign Ministry in the last week a peculiar 'theatre performance'
outside my window, which obviously served to represent some mafioso monkeybusiness
(there have been some of those - people mobiled up from nearby cafes to make
some significant theatre which lets me relate to some monkeybiz terrorism elsewhere
on the globe). It was a man who was fumbling with a pump-like thing under my
window. I later saw a taxi-driver pump up his tyre with a similar device, something
which let me venture the hypothesis that it served to represent Barbara-and-Ford,
where 'Barbara' is the conventional Norwegian name for a pumpable human-size
sex-doll and Ford is the name of the scandalous Ford Explorer whose tyres were
recalled last year and which evidently served to represent Siv-Ellen Kraft from
Bergen in Norway, who was used for representing the SEK (see attached document)
in the Monkeybiz Project - probably for the concept of 'flatulental monkeybiz'
which I have used several times. The Ford case was up again in the news last
week. Hence Barbara-and-Ford is perhaps not a farfetched interpretation of the
pump-man outside my window, and then it could also be relevant to the present
case. My letter was sent to urm@urm.lt. If that is relevant, then a connection
to the corrupt Monkeybiz Project seems likely. - I notice also a certain name-similarity
with dissident Osama bin Laden and a certain similarity with how the norsies
may consider me.
6. Saladin was also the famous Kurd who ruled Egypt, commenting on the other
famous Kurd Abdullah Ocalan today. His name is similar to the name Ulla Heggelund
(plus "An ABC's", for Xenophon's Anabasis which is the parallel text
in my "...to be an emperor..". This all smells very Norwegian,
and if I were to search for a clue to the 'arbitrary sentences' in the present
case, the material in the enclosed study could certainly lead me to the Norwegian
Foreign Ministry.
7. Finally, Ford(e) is the chief of the Norwegian broadcasting, called 'kringkasting'
in Norwegian, and hence Barbara and Ford will come out as Second Coming of Christ
if Norwegians are involved.
To conclude, it would perhaps be wise to consider the possibility of corruption
among the judges (if they are bribable, I don't know) from the Monkeybiz Project
in order to represent my authorship and to continue the pirating of my authorship
relative to the Pope's travel to Syria. That Monkeybiz Project is now not much
more than mafia and terrorists and not worth supporting, even if the Norwegian
government unfortunately still are much entangled in it and still may be surfing
on an initial wave of goodwill which it was not entitled to. Certainly that
state cannot last and a new government will have to get the country out of the
mess. There has been much misunderstanding and false propaganda about this Monkeybiz
Project and its intentions, and the sentence against Ibrahim could perhaps even
be related to such misunderstandings, for all I know.
Best wishes,
John Grover
John Grover
PO Box 2943
2000 Vilnius
Lithuania
